Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Options and Benefits of authentication system via Dynamic Biometric Signature

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26510%2F17%3APU123474" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26510/17:PU123474 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://www.mvso.cz/data/upload/IDS_2017_Conference_Proceedings.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.mvso.cz/data/upload/IDS_2017_Conference_Proceedings.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Options and Benefits of authentication system via Dynamic Biometric Signature

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The new information technologies alongside its benefits also brings new dangers. Dangers of online services are growing in terms of attacks faced and their volume. The majority of detected threats use specialized remote access or hacking tools during at least one stage of the attack. Alongside malware-driven attacks, different fraudulent schemes based on social engineering methods, as well as attempts to misuse the application or bypass application business logic and limits, are starting to appear much more often. One of the possible answers to these threats will be changing how online communication services can authenticate users. For this cause the main aim of this paper is to provide a complete information about one of the most natural biometric authentication methods: the use of dynamic biometric signature (DBS). Dynamic signature contains biometric information that reflects the characteristics of the signing person, i.e. the habits and behaviours. These properties represent a biometric footprint, which is unique to each individual and cannot be reproduced by counterfeiters. This technology can provide the same level of security as is in the case of electronic signatures employing certificate-based cryptographic methods. Based on the public inquiry research the most users cannot distinguish among signature recognition systems, electronic signatures, and dynamic biometric signature. So this paper also deals with the technological differences to clarify the technological differences among these methods.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Options and Benefits of authentication system via Dynamic Biometric Signature

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The new information technologies alongside its benefits also brings new dangers. Dangers of online services are growing in terms of attacks faced and their volume. The majority of detected threats use specialized remote access or hacking tools during at least one stage of the attack. Alongside malware-driven attacks, different fraudulent schemes based on social engineering methods, as well as attempts to misuse the application or bypass application business logic and limits, are starting to appear much more often. One of the possible answers to these threats will be changing how online communication services can authenticate users. For this cause the main aim of this paper is to provide a complete information about one of the most natural biometric authentication methods: the use of dynamic biometric signature (DBS). Dynamic signature contains biometric information that reflects the characteristics of the signing person, i.e. the habits and behaviours. These properties represent a biometric footprint, which is unique to each individual and cannot be reproduced by counterfeiters. This technology can provide the same level of security as is in the case of electronic signatures employing certificate-based cryptographic methods. Based on the public inquiry research the most users cannot distinguish among signature recognition systems, electronic signatures, and dynamic biometric signature. So this paper also deals with the technological differences to clarify the technological differences among these methods.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50201 - Economic Theory

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2017

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. International Day of Science 2017 - Economics, Managemnet, Innovation

  • ISBN

    978-80-7455-060-7

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    273

  • Strana od-do

    75-83

  • Název nakladatele

    Moravian University College Olomouc

  • Místo vydání

    Olomouc

  • Místo konání akce

    Olomouc

  • Datum konání akce

    25. 4. 2017

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku