Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

A Review of Tooth Implantation Among Rhynchocephalians (Lepidosauria)

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26620%2F17%3APU125530" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26620/17:PU125530 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1670/16-146" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1670/16-146</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1670/16-146" target="_blank" >10.1670/16-146</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    A Review of Tooth Implantation Among Rhynchocephalians (Lepidosauria)

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Acrodont dental implantation is widely considered an important character for referring fossil material to Rhynchocephalia. Under its purest definition, acrodonty involves teeth being attached to the crest of the marginal bones without roots. A similar mode of tooth attachment is known in a variety of other reptile groups including some squamates and procolophonids. There is a lack of consensus on the definition of acrodont, how best to characterize tooth implantation, and the relationship between implantation and tooth replacement. Rhynchocephalians already are known to demonstrate variation in their mode of tooth attachment. Unambiguous acrodonty associated with little or no tooth replacement has been associated with Sphenodon, but it appears to have been the most widespread condition for much of the Mesozoic. A form of pleurodonty, where teeth are attached to the inside of the jaw bone with shallow roots, appears to be the plesiomorphic condition for both Lepidosauria and Rhynchocephalia. Jaws with anterior pleurodont teeth and posterior acrodont teeth appear to have been common for early rhynchocephalians in the Triassic, and Ankylosphenodon from the early Cretaceous of Mexico demonstrates that at least some later rhynchocephalians possessed continually replacing dentition, but identification of this trait requires inspection of internal anatomy. When cross-sections of teeth are unavailable or the lingual view of jaws is obscured, one cannot be 100% confident of acrodont implantation, and acrodonty’’ should not be used as a single character to refer incomplete jaw material to Rhynchocephalia. Tooth implantation is a component that was highly variable in a once-diverse reptile group.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    A Review of Tooth Implantation Among Rhynchocephalians (Lepidosauria)

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Acrodont dental implantation is widely considered an important character for referring fossil material to Rhynchocephalia. Under its purest definition, acrodonty involves teeth being attached to the crest of the marginal bones without roots. A similar mode of tooth attachment is known in a variety of other reptile groups including some squamates and procolophonids. There is a lack of consensus on the definition of acrodont, how best to characterize tooth implantation, and the relationship between implantation and tooth replacement. Rhynchocephalians already are known to demonstrate variation in their mode of tooth attachment. Unambiguous acrodonty associated with little or no tooth replacement has been associated with Sphenodon, but it appears to have been the most widespread condition for much of the Mesozoic. A form of pleurodonty, where teeth are attached to the inside of the jaw bone with shallow roots, appears to be the plesiomorphic condition for both Lepidosauria and Rhynchocephalia. Jaws with anterior pleurodont teeth and posterior acrodont teeth appear to have been common for early rhynchocephalians in the Triassic, and Ankylosphenodon from the early Cretaceous of Mexico demonstrates that at least some later rhynchocephalians possessed continually replacing dentition, but identification of this trait requires inspection of internal anatomy. When cross-sections of teeth are unavailable or the lingual view of jaws is obscured, one cannot be 100% confident of acrodont implantation, and acrodonty’’ should not be used as a single character to refer incomplete jaw material to Rhynchocephalia. Tooth implantation is a component that was highly variable in a once-diverse reptile group.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10602 - Biology (theoretical, mathematical, thermal, cryobiology, biological rhythm), Evolutionary biology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/LQ1601" target="_blank" >LQ1601: CEITEC 2020</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2017

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    JOURNAL OF HERPETOLOGY

  • ISSN

    0022-1511

  • e-ISSN

    1937-2418

  • Svazek periodika

    51

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    3

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    300-306

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000407503000003

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85026370583