Different pathways of regulatory sandboxes in Europe: Literature review with a special focus on Czechia.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26630%2F26%3A0198982" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26630/26:0198982 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://lex-localis.org/index.php/LexLocalis/article/view/803445" target="_blank" >https://lex-localis.org/index.php/LexLocalis/article/view/803445</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.52152/89mm9g16" target="_blank" >10.52152/89mm9g16</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Different pathways of regulatory sandboxes in Europe: Literature review with a special focus on Czechia.

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

For more than forty-five years, including the years of the communist regime, there has been an instrument in Czech legislation allowing experimental validation of innovations in the public education system (e.g., methods, forms, or organization of education). Despite this fact and other recommendations from the OECD or the European Commission, Czechia, in contrast to neighboring countries, has not yet implemented a true regulatory sandbox. The objectives of this article are (i) to describe the development of regulatory sandboxes in Czechia, (ii) to compare it with other Central and Eastern European countries and (ii) to provide recommendations for further steps in the responsibility of regulatory sandboxes and their establishment in the Czech legal environment. To achieve the objectives, a review of literature and policy documents was used.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Different pathways of regulatory sandboxes in Europe: Literature review with a special focus on Czechia.

Popis výsledku anglicky

For more than forty-five years, including the years of the communist regime, there has been an instrument in Czech legislation allowing experimental validation of innovations in the public education system (e.g., methods, forms, or organization of education). Despite this fact and other recommendations from the OECD or the European Commission, Czechia, in contrast to neighboring countries, has not yet implemented a true regulatory sandbox. The objectives of this article are (i) to describe the development of regulatory sandboxes in Czechia, (ii) to compare it with other Central and Eastern European countries and (ii) to provide recommendations for further steps in the responsibility of regulatory sandboxes and their establishment in the Czech legal environment. To achieve the objectives, a review of literature and policy documents was used.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2026

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government

ISSN

1581-5374

e-ISSN

1855-363X

Svazek periodika

24

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

SI - Slovinská republika

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

246-270

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—