Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Catheterization The PROPHET-II Randomized Trial
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00669806%3A_____%2F16%3A10329488" target="_blank" >RIV/00669806:_____/16:10329488 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11140/16:10329488
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Catheterization The PROPHET-II Randomized Trial
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
OBJECTIVES The study sought to evaluate whether prophylactic ipsilateral ulnar artery compression during radial artery hemostasis could reduce the risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO). BACKGROUND RAO after transradial access (TRA) is a structural complication of TRA. It limits future ipsilateral TRA and may cause transient pain. Maintaining radial artery flow during hemostasis reduces the incidence of acute RAO. Ipsilateral ulnar compression increases radial artery flow and could impact the incidence of RAO. METHODS Three thousand patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization using TRA were randomized to receive either standard patent hemostasis protocol (Group I) or prophylactic ipsilateral ulnar compression in addition to patent hemostasis (Group II). Using plethysmography, radial artery patency was evaluated at the time of removal of the compression device as well as 24 h and 30 days after the procedure. The primary study endpoint was 30-day RAO. RESULTS The primary endpoint, 30-day RAO, was significantly reduced in patients with patent hemostasis and prophylactic ulnar compression compared with standard patent hemostasis (0.9% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.0001). Baseline patient and procedural characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. RAO was significantly reduced by prophylactic ulnar compression at all time intervals (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic ipsilateral ulnar compression during radial artery hemostasis is an effective, simple, and inexpensive technique that lowers the risk of RAO after TRA. (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Catheterization The PROPHET-II Randomized Trial
Popis výsledku anglicky
OBJECTIVES The study sought to evaluate whether prophylactic ipsilateral ulnar artery compression during radial artery hemostasis could reduce the risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO). BACKGROUND RAO after transradial access (TRA) is a structural complication of TRA. It limits future ipsilateral TRA and may cause transient pain. Maintaining radial artery flow during hemostasis reduces the incidence of acute RAO. Ipsilateral ulnar compression increases radial artery flow and could impact the incidence of RAO. METHODS Three thousand patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization using TRA were randomized to receive either standard patent hemostasis protocol (Group I) or prophylactic ipsilateral ulnar compression in addition to patent hemostasis (Group II). Using plethysmography, radial artery patency was evaluated at the time of removal of the compression device as well as 24 h and 30 days after the procedure. The primary study endpoint was 30-day RAO. RESULTS The primary endpoint, 30-day RAO, was significantly reduced in patients with patent hemostasis and prophylactic ulnar compression compared with standard patent hemostasis (0.9% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.0001). Baseline patient and procedural characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. RAO was significantly reduced by prophylactic ulnar compression at all time intervals (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic ipsilateral ulnar compression during radial artery hemostasis is an effective, simple, and inexpensive technique that lowers the risk of RAO after TRA. (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
ISSN
1936-8798
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
9
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
19
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
1992-1999
Kód UT WoS článku
000385714600005
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84994067178