Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Catheterization The PROPHET-II Randomized Trial

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00669806%3A_____%2F16%3A10329488" target="_blank" >RIV/00669806:_____/16:10329488 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00216208:11140/16:10329488

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Catheterization The PROPHET-II Randomized Trial

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    OBJECTIVES The study sought to evaluate whether prophylactic ipsilateral ulnar artery compression during radial artery hemostasis could reduce the risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO). BACKGROUND RAO after transradial access (TRA) is a structural complication of TRA. It limits future ipsilateral TRA and may cause transient pain. Maintaining radial artery flow during hemostasis reduces the incidence of acute RAO. Ipsilateral ulnar compression increases radial artery flow and could impact the incidence of RAO. METHODS Three thousand patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization using TRA were randomized to receive either standard patent hemostasis protocol (Group I) or prophylactic ipsilateral ulnar compression in addition to patent hemostasis (Group II). Using plethysmography, radial artery patency was evaluated at the time of removal of the compression device as well as 24 h and 30 days after the procedure. The primary study endpoint was 30-day RAO. RESULTS The primary endpoint, 30-day RAO, was significantly reduced in patients with patent hemostasis and prophylactic ulnar compression compared with standard patent hemostasis (0.9% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.0001). Baseline patient and procedural characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. RAO was significantly reduced by prophylactic ulnar compression at all time intervals (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic ipsilateral ulnar compression during radial artery hemostasis is an effective, simple, and inexpensive technique that lowers the risk of RAO after TRA. (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Catheterization The PROPHET-II Randomized Trial

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    OBJECTIVES The study sought to evaluate whether prophylactic ipsilateral ulnar artery compression during radial artery hemostasis could reduce the risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO). BACKGROUND RAO after transradial access (TRA) is a structural complication of TRA. It limits future ipsilateral TRA and may cause transient pain. Maintaining radial artery flow during hemostasis reduces the incidence of acute RAO. Ipsilateral ulnar compression increases radial artery flow and could impact the incidence of RAO. METHODS Three thousand patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization using TRA were randomized to receive either standard patent hemostasis protocol (Group I) or prophylactic ipsilateral ulnar compression in addition to patent hemostasis (Group II). Using plethysmography, radial artery patency was evaluated at the time of removal of the compression device as well as 24 h and 30 days after the procedure. The primary study endpoint was 30-day RAO. RESULTS The primary endpoint, 30-day RAO, was significantly reduced in patients with patent hemostasis and prophylactic ulnar compression compared with standard patent hemostasis (0.9% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.0001). Baseline patient and procedural characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. RAO was significantly reduced by prophylactic ulnar compression at all time intervals (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic ipsilateral ulnar compression during radial artery hemostasis is an effective, simple, and inexpensive technique that lowers the risk of RAO after TRA. (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

  • CEP obor

    FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie

  • OECD FORD obor

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2016

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

  • ISSN

    1936-8798

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    9

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    19

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    8

  • Strana od-do

    1992-1999

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000385714600005

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-84994067178