Stroke Volume Measurements by Echocardiography and Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor in Children: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00669806%3A_____%2F23%3A10465560" target="_blank" >RIV/00669806:_____/23:10465560 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11140/23:10465560

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=FD1N.78ChE" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=FD1N.78ChE</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003018" target="_blank" >10.1097/PEC.0000000000003018</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Stroke Volume Measurements by Echocardiography and Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor in Children: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objectives: Stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output monitoring is a comerstone of hemodynamic assessment. Noninvasive technologies are increasingly used in children. This study compared SV measurements obtained by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound techniques (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor), transthoraic echocardiography jugular (TTE-J), and parasternal (TTE-P) views performed vy pediatric intensivists (OP-As) with limited training in cardiac sonography (20 previous examinations) and pediatric cardiologists (OP-Bs) with limited training in USCOM (30) previous examinations) in spontaneously ventilating children. Methods: A single-center study was conducted in 37 children. Each operator obtained 3sets of USCOM SV measurements within a period of 3 to 5 minutes, followed with TTE measurements from both apical and jugular views. The investigators were blinded to each other&apos;s results to prevent visual and auditory bias. Conclusions: Our findings show that the methods are not interchangeable because SV values by USCOM are higher in comparison with the SV values obtained by TTE. Both methods have low level of intraobserver variability. The SV measurements obtained by TTE-P were significantly lower compared with the TTE-J for the operator with limited training in echocardiography. The TTE-P requires longer practice compared with the TTE-J; therefore, we recommend to prefer TTE-J to TTE-P for inexperienced operators.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Stroke Volume Measurements by Echocardiography and Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor in Children: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objectives: Stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output monitoring is a comerstone of hemodynamic assessment. Noninvasive technologies are increasingly used in children. This study compared SV measurements obtained by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound techniques (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor), transthoraic echocardiography jugular (TTE-J), and parasternal (TTE-P) views performed vy pediatric intensivists (OP-As) with limited training in cardiac sonography (20 previous examinations) and pediatric cardiologists (OP-Bs) with limited training in USCOM (30) previous examinations) in spontaneously ventilating children. Methods: A single-center study was conducted in 37 children. Each operator obtained 3sets of USCOM SV measurements within a period of 3 to 5 minutes, followed with TTE measurements from both apical and jugular views. The investigators were blinded to each other&apos;s results to prevent visual and auditory bias. Conclusions: Our findings show that the methods are not interchangeable because SV values by USCOM are higher in comparison with the SV values obtained by TTE. Both methods have low level of intraobserver variability. The SV measurements obtained by TTE-P were significantly lower compared with the TTE-J for the operator with limited training in echocardiography. The TTE-P requires longer practice compared with the TTE-J; therefore, we recommend to prefer TTE-J to TTE-P for inexperienced operators.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30209 - Paediatrics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Pediatric Emergency Care

ISSN

0749-5161

e-ISSN

1535-1815

Svazek periodika

39

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

9

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

680-684

Kód UT WoS článku

001057981800009

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85169180202