Birth and Regulation of head Extension to Guide Manual perineal Assistance (BREGMA) study: a prospective cohort study
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00669806%3A_____%2F25%3A10496346" target="_blank" >RIV/00669806:_____/25:10496346 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11140/25:10496346
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=rDPO-SAvsB" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=rDPO-SAvsB</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07428-z" target="_blank" >10.1186/s12884-025-07428-z</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Birth and Regulation of head Extension to Guide Manual perineal Assistance (BREGMA) study: a prospective cohort study
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
BACKGROUND: The exact positioning of the dominant hand at the time of manual perineal protection (MPP) is not clearly specified. The main aim of this work was to identify the place on the perineum where pressure needs to be applied to achieve optimal forward fetal head displacement away from the anal sphincters using the bregma to posterior fourchette distance (BFD) and the perineal body length (PBL). METHODS: This was a two-center prospective cohort study. Term cephalic singleton nulliparous women having spontaneous vaginal delivery were considered eligible for recruitment into the study. Once crowning was diagnosed and just prior the initiation of manual perineal protection (MPP) or cutting an episiotomy, the BFD and PBL were measured using a standardized measurement protocol. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 100 women (50 women in each center) were recruited into the study. The overall mean BFD was 2.8 +- 0.5 cm. The overall mean PBL was 4.4 +- 0.8 cm. There were no statistically significant differences between the measurements taken in both units regarding BFD or PBL (p = 0.81 and 0.10 respectively). There was a weak correlation between both measurements. Based on our measured parameters, it seems that the most effective point to apply perineal pressure to displace the head away from the anus is approximately 1 - 1.5 cm anterior to the anal margin. CONCLUSION: Measurements generated by this study will form the bases of future biomechanical studies to confirm their validity.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Birth and Regulation of head Extension to Guide Manual perineal Assistance (BREGMA) study: a prospective cohort study
Popis výsledku anglicky
BACKGROUND: The exact positioning of the dominant hand at the time of manual perineal protection (MPP) is not clearly specified. The main aim of this work was to identify the place on the perineum where pressure needs to be applied to achieve optimal forward fetal head displacement away from the anal sphincters using the bregma to posterior fourchette distance (BFD) and the perineal body length (PBL). METHODS: This was a two-center prospective cohort study. Term cephalic singleton nulliparous women having spontaneous vaginal delivery were considered eligible for recruitment into the study. Once crowning was diagnosed and just prior the initiation of manual perineal protection (MPP) or cutting an episiotomy, the BFD and PBL were measured using a standardized measurement protocol. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 100 women (50 women in each center) were recruited into the study. The overall mean BFD was 2.8 +- 0.5 cm. The overall mean PBL was 4.4 +- 0.8 cm. There were no statistically significant differences between the measurements taken in both units regarding BFD or PBL (p = 0.81 and 0.10 respectively). There was a weak correlation between both measurements. Based on our measured parameters, it seems that the most effective point to apply perineal pressure to displace the head away from the anus is approximately 1 - 1.5 cm anterior to the anal margin. CONCLUSION: Measurements generated by this study will form the bases of future biomechanical studies to confirm their validity.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30214 - Obstetrics and gynaecology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/EH23_021%2F0008828" target="_blank" >EH23_021/0008828: Integrace biomedicínského výzkumu a zdravotní péče v metropolitní oblasti Plzeň</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
ISSN
1471-2393
e-ISSN
1471-2393
Svazek periodika
25
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
334
Kód UT WoS článku
001449745400003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105000553596