Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in gynecologic tumours by planar scintigraphy and SPECT/CT
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F12%3A00102567" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/12:00102567 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61988987:17110/12:A13016PU
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/Mirt.236" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/Mirt.236</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/Mirt.236" target="_blank" >10.4274/Mirt.236</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in gynecologic tumours by planar scintigraphy and SPECT/CT
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Assess the role of planar lymphoscintigraphy and fusion imaging of SPECT/CT in sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in patients with gynecologic tumours. Planar scintigraphy and hybrid modality SPECT/CT were performed in 64 consecutive women with gynecologic tumours (mean age 53.6 with range 30-77 years): 36 pts with cervical cancer (Group A), 21 pts with endometrial cancer (Group B), 7 pts with vulvar carcinoma (Group C). Planar and SPECT/CT images were interpreted separately by two nuclear medicine physicians. Efficacy of these two techniques to image SLN were compared. Planar scintigraphy did not image SLN in 7 patients (10.9%), SPECT/CT was negative in 4 patients (6.3%). In 35 (54.7%) patients the number of SLNs captured on SPECT/CT was higher thanon planar imaging. Differences in detection of SLN between planar and SPECT/CT imaging in the group of all 64 patients are statistically significant (p<0.05). Three foci of uptake (1.7% from totally visible 177 foci on planar images) in 2
Název v anglickém jazyce
Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in gynecologic tumours by planar scintigraphy and SPECT/CT
Popis výsledku anglicky
Assess the role of planar lymphoscintigraphy and fusion imaging of SPECT/CT in sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in patients with gynecologic tumours. Planar scintigraphy and hybrid modality SPECT/CT were performed in 64 consecutive women with gynecologic tumours (mean age 53.6 with range 30-77 years): 36 pts with cervical cancer (Group A), 21 pts with endometrial cancer (Group B), 7 pts with vulvar carcinoma (Group C). Planar and SPECT/CT images were interpreted separately by two nuclear medicine physicians. Efficacy of these two techniques to image SLN were compared. Planar scintigraphy did not image SLN in 7 patients (10.9%), SPECT/CT was negative in 4 patients (6.3%). In 35 (54.7%) patients the number of SLNs captured on SPECT/CT was higher thanon planar imaging. Differences in detection of SLN between planar and SPECT/CT imaging in the group of all 64 patients are statistically significant (p<0.05). Three foci of uptake (1.7% from totally visible 177 foci on planar images) in 2
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FP - Ostatní lékařské obory
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2012
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy
ISSN
2146-1414
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
21
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
TR - Turecká republika
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
47-55
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—