A survey on the global status of newborn and infant hearing screening

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F20%3AE0108908" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/20:E0108908 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1130&context=jehdi" target="_blank" >https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1130&context=jehdi</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.26077/a221-cc28" target="_blank" >10.26077/a221-cc28</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A survey on the global status of newborn and infant hearing screening

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objective: Assess the global status of newborn/infant hearing screening (NIHS) and its effectiveness in early detection and intervention of permanent childhood hearing loss (PCHL). Design: Individuals potentially involved with NIHS in 196 countries/territories (in the following text referred to as countries) received a questionnaire about coverage, strategies, and outcomes of country-specific NIHS programs. Study Sample: Questionnaires from 158 countries were returned. Results: Thirty-eight percent of the world’s population were reported to have no/minimal screening, 33% reported screening more than above 85% of the babies (hereafter referred to as universal newborn hearing screening [UNHS]). Mean living standard of countries with UNHS was 10 times higher than in countries with NIHS coverage that was less than 10%. Average age at diagnosis of PCHL was 4.6 months for screened children and 34.9 months for non-screened children. Average age at start of intervention was 6.9 months for screened children and 35.2 months for non-screened children. Methods used for screening included otoacoustic emissions (OAE) in 57% of countries, automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) in 11%, and two-step OAE-AABR in 30%. On average, 4.5% of the infants failed the screening and 17.2% of those children were reported as lost-to-follow-up. The prevalence of PCHL identified in NIHS programs ranged from 0.3–15.0 per 1,000 infants with a median of 1.70. Conclusions: Newborns with PCHL are more likely to benefit from early identification and intervention in countries where NIHS is done. There is a need to invest in NIHS programs, including data collection, in low-income countries.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A survey on the global status of newborn and infant hearing screening

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objective: Assess the global status of newborn/infant hearing screening (NIHS) and its effectiveness in early detection and intervention of permanent childhood hearing loss (PCHL). Design: Individuals potentially involved with NIHS in 196 countries/territories (in the following text referred to as countries) received a questionnaire about coverage, strategies, and outcomes of country-specific NIHS programs. Study Sample: Questionnaires from 158 countries were returned. Results: Thirty-eight percent of the world’s population were reported to have no/minimal screening, 33% reported screening more than above 85% of the babies (hereafter referred to as universal newborn hearing screening [UNHS]). Mean living standard of countries with UNHS was 10 times higher than in countries with NIHS coverage that was less than 10%. Average age at diagnosis of PCHL was 4.6 months for screened children and 34.9 months for non-screened children. Average age at start of intervention was 6.9 months for screened children and 35.2 months for non-screened children. Methods used for screening included otoacoustic emissions (OAE) in 57% of countries, automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) in 11%, and two-step OAE-AABR in 30%. On average, 4.5% of the infants failed the screening and 17.2% of those children were reported as lost-to-follow-up. The prevalence of PCHL identified in NIHS programs ranged from 0.3–15.0 per 1,000 infants with a median of 1.70. Conclusions: Newborns with PCHL are more likely to benefit from early identification and intervention in countries where NIHS is done. There is a need to invest in NIHS programs, including data collection, in low-income countries.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30206 - Otorhinolaryngology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

The Journal of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention

ISSN

2381-2362

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

5

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

63-84

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—