Endoscopic two-port technique for orbital tumours: combined transnasal and sublabial approach

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F22%3AE0110038" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/22:E0110038 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/61988987:17110/22:A2302J69

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.viamedica.pl/neurologia_neurochirurgia_polska/article/view/90436" target="_blank" >https://journals.viamedica.pl/neurologia_neurochirurgia_polska/article/view/90436</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/PJNNS.a2022.0071" target="_blank" >10.5603/PJNNS.a2022.0071</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Endoscopic two-port technique for orbital tumours: combined transnasal and sublabial approach

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Introduction: The aim of this study was to present the indications for a combined endoscopic transnasal and sublabial transantral approach for the surgical treatment of orbital lesions. Material and methods: This case study enrolled 10 patients scheduled for endoscopic transnasal surgery for treating orbital lesions from 2009 to 2020. When the tumour was localised to the medial part of the orbit, patients underwent endoscopy with a transnasal mononostril approach. Alternatively, when the tumour was localised to the mediocaudal part of the orbit, and when instrument manoeuvreability was limited, the transnasal approach was combined with a sublabial transantral approach. Herein, we evaluate the indications, complications, and advantages of monoportal and combined two-portal approaches. Results: 8/10 patients (80%) underwent surgery with the transnasal mononostril approach, and 2/10 (20%) underwent surgery with the combined transnasal mononostril and sublabial transantral approach. In the two latter cases, visualisation of the operation field was excellent, and there was adequate room for manipulating instruments. Conclusions: The combined mononostril-transantral approach provided the space necessary to manoeuvre instruments and to visualise the surgical field in treating mediocaudal orbital lesions. Clinical implications: This two-portal approach enables extensive resections of intraconal lesions. It should be considered to be a suitable and safer alternative to the binostril approach.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Endoscopic two-port technique for orbital tumours: combined transnasal and sublabial approach

Popis výsledku anglicky

Introduction: The aim of this study was to present the indications for a combined endoscopic transnasal and sublabial transantral approach for the surgical treatment of orbital lesions. Material and methods: This case study enrolled 10 patients scheduled for endoscopic transnasal surgery for treating orbital lesions from 2009 to 2020. When the tumour was localised to the medial part of the orbit, patients underwent endoscopy with a transnasal mononostril approach. Alternatively, when the tumour was localised to the mediocaudal part of the orbit, and when instrument manoeuvreability was limited, the transnasal approach was combined with a sublabial transantral approach. Herein, we evaluate the indications, complications, and advantages of monoportal and combined two-portal approaches. Results: 8/10 patients (80%) underwent surgery with the transnasal mononostril approach, and 2/10 (20%) underwent surgery with the combined transnasal mononostril and sublabial transantral approach. In the two latter cases, visualisation of the operation field was excellent, and there was adequate room for manipulating instruments. Conclusions: The combined mononostril-transantral approach provided the space necessary to manoeuvre instruments and to visualise the surgical field in treating mediocaudal orbital lesions. Clinical implications: This two-portal approach enables extensive resections of intraconal lesions. It should be considered to be a suitable and safer alternative to the binostril approach.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30206 - Otorhinolaryngology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

ISSN

0028-3843

e-ISSN

1897-4260

Svazek periodika

56

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

503-507

Kód UT WoS článku

000907156800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85145242406