Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

The impact of the mySupport advance care planning intervention on family caregivers’ perceptions of decision-making and care for nursing home residents with dementia: pretest-posttest study in six countries

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F03463583%3A_____%2F23%3AN0000001" target="_blank" >RIV/03463583:_____/23:N0000001 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978311/" target="_blank" >https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978311/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad027" target="_blank" >10.1093/ageing/afad027</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    The impact of the mySupport advance care planning intervention on family caregivers’ perceptions of decision-making and care for nursing home residents with dementia: pretest-posttest study in six countries

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Background: the mySupport advance care planning intervention was originally developed and evaluated in Northern Ireland (UK). Family caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia received an educational booklet and a family care conference with a trained facilitator to discuss their relative's future care. Objectives: to investigate whether upscaling the intervention adapted to local context and complemented by a question prompt list impacts family caregivers' uncertainty in decision-making and their satisfaction with care across six countries. Second, to investigate whether mySupport affects residents' hospitalisations and documented advance decisions. Design: a pretest-posttest design. Setting: in Canada, the Czech Republic, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands and the UK, two nursing homes participated. Participants: in total, 88 family caregivers completed baseline, intervention and follow-up assessments. Methods: family caregivers' scores on the Decisional Conflict Scale and Family Perceptions of Care Scale before and after the intervention were compared with linear mixed models. The number of documented advance decisions and residents' hospitalisations was obtained via chart review or reported by nursing home staff and compared between baseline and follow-up with McNemar tests. Results: family caregivers reported less decision-making uncertainty (-9.6, 95% confidence interval: -13.3, -6.0, P < 0.001) and more positive perceptions of care (+11.4, 95% confidence interval: 7.8, 15.0; P < 0.001) after the intervention. The number of advance decisions to refuse treatment was significantly higher after the intervention (21 vs 16); the number of other advance decisions or hospitalisations was unchanged. Conclusions: the mySupport intervention may be impactful in countries beyond the original setting.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    The impact of the mySupport advance care planning intervention on family caregivers’ perceptions of decision-making and care for nursing home residents with dementia: pretest-posttest study in six countries

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Background: the mySupport advance care planning intervention was originally developed and evaluated in Northern Ireland (UK). Family caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia received an educational booklet and a family care conference with a trained facilitator to discuss their relative's future care. Objectives: to investigate whether upscaling the intervention adapted to local context and complemented by a question prompt list impacts family caregivers' uncertainty in decision-making and their satisfaction with care across six countries. Second, to investigate whether mySupport affects residents' hospitalisations and documented advance decisions. Design: a pretest-posttest design. Setting: in Canada, the Czech Republic, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands and the UK, two nursing homes participated. Participants: in total, 88 family caregivers completed baseline, intervention and follow-up assessments. Methods: family caregivers' scores on the Decisional Conflict Scale and Family Perceptions of Care Scale before and after the intervention were compared with linear mixed models. The number of documented advance decisions and residents' hospitalisations was obtained via chart review or reported by nursing home staff and compared between baseline and follow-up with McNemar tests. Results: family caregivers reported less decision-making uncertainty (-9.6, 95% confidence interval: -13.3, -6.0, P < 0.001) and more positive perceptions of care (+11.4, 95% confidence interval: 7.8, 15.0; P < 0.001) after the intervention. The number of advance decisions to refuse treatment was significantly higher after the intervention (21 vs 16); the number of other advance decisions or hospitalisations was unchanged. Conclusions: the mySupport intervention may be impactful in countries beyond the original setting.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30301 - Social biomedical sciences (includes family planning, sexual health, psycho-oncology, political and social effects of biomedical research)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/8F19005" target="_blank" >8F19005: Scaling up the Family Career Decision Support Intervention: A transnational effectiveness-implementation evaluation</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2023

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Age and Ageing

  • ISSN

    1468-2834

  • e-ISSN

    1468-2834

  • Svazek periodika

    52

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    3

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    9

  • Strana od-do

    1-9

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000942521100004

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85149428319