The Fiscalization of Child Benefits
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F04274644%3A_____%2F16%3A%230000206" target="_blank" >RIV/04274644:_____/16:#0000206 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://knowledgeconference.upol.cz/downloads/2016-Knowledge_for_Market_Use_Proceedings.pdf" target="_blank" >http://knowledgeconference.upol.cz/downloads/2016-Knowledge_for_Market_Use_Proceedings.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/pr.2016.sed.2155.8" target="_blank" >10.18267/pr.2016.sed.2155.8</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Fiscalization of Child Benefits
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The distortions of the Czech public pensions are seducing to treat pension contributions as if they were an income tax. This includes the proposal of the Pensions Commission to differentiate the pension contribution rates according to the number of dependent children. Its proponents ask to finance the opportunity costs of raising children by these tax rebates. Such extreme requirements do not fit in the typical conservative social model, let alone any other family policy models. In comparison with this background, the Commission’s proposal is very modest. A simple and effective child benefits reform involves a shift to substantially higher and universal benefits that would bring even more to the respective party’s electorate. The further fiscalization of Czech child benefits is ineffective. Czech and international experience has shown that Czech child benefits can be effectively provided both by the social administration and the tax administration.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Fiscalization of Child Benefits
Popis výsledku anglicky
The distortions of the Czech public pensions are seducing to treat pension contributions as if they were an income tax. This includes the proposal of the Pensions Commission to differentiate the pension contribution rates according to the number of dependent children. Its proponents ask to finance the opportunity costs of raising children by these tax rebates. Such extreme requirements do not fit in the typical conservative social model, let alone any other family policy models. In comparison with this background, the Commission’s proposal is very modest. A simple and effective child benefits reform involves a shift to substantially higher and universal benefits that would bring even more to the respective party’s electorate. The further fiscalization of Czech child benefits is ineffective. Czech and international experience has shown that Czech child benefits can be effectively provided both by the social administration and the tax administration.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50600 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Proceedings of the 21th International Conference Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance 2016
ISBN
9788024521558
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
326-331
Název nakladatele
Oeconomica
Místo vydání
Praha
Místo konání akce
Praha
Datum konání akce
1. 1. 2016
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000392677500052