Thou shalt not read: ius abutendi as a moral right of the author?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F04274644%3A_____%2F23%3A%230001035" target="_blank" >RIV/04274644:_____/23:#0001035 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781789904871/book-part-9781789904871-42.xml" target="_blank" >https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781789904871/book-part-9781789904871-42.xml</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781789904871.00042" target="_blank" >10.4337/9781789904871.00042</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Thou shalt not read: ius abutendi as a moral right of the author?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This study explores strategies employed by the authors who do not want their works available. Cases of Bernhard, Kundera and Wagner document situation in which the author wished to limit the circle of the audience. Often authors suppress the publication for various private reasons during their lifetime, but do not limit the heirs with disposing with the work once they pass away (case of the Slovak author Dominik Tatarka). On the contrary, the work remains sometimes undisclosed or withdrawn from circulation after the death of the author (very peculiar cases of Freud and the copyright case of Hitler are discussed). Destruction of all copies of the work, is discussed under the copyright, property, and inheritance laws where the copy is destroyed by an owner different from the author, by the author or the successors with special focus on Virgil’s and Kafka’s last wishes. The study argues that while the works are fully at the hands of their authors while they are alive, their post mortal erasure by testamentary executors or heirs should be considered illegal.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Thou shalt not read: ius abutendi as a moral right of the author?

Popis výsledku anglicky

This study explores strategies employed by the authors who do not want their works available. Cases of Bernhard, Kundera and Wagner document situation in which the author wished to limit the circle of the audience. Often authors suppress the publication for various private reasons during their lifetime, but do not limit the heirs with disposing with the work once they pass away (case of the Slovak author Dominik Tatarka). On the contrary, the work remains sometimes undisclosed or withdrawn from circulation after the death of the author (very peculiar cases of Freud and the copyright case of Hitler are discussed). Destruction of all copies of the work, is discussed under the copyright, property, and inheritance laws where the copy is destroyed by an owner different from the author, by the author or the successors with special focus on Virgil’s and Kafka’s last wishes. The study argues that while the works are fully at the hands of their authors while they are alive, their post mortal erasure by testamentary executors or heirs should be considered illegal.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50902 - Social sciences, interdisciplinary

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Moral Rights

ISBN

9781789904864

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

494-515

Počet stran knihy

582

Název nakladatele

Edward Elgar Publishing

Místo vydání

Cheltenham

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—