Positional investing and reforms in the socio-economic sphere on the example of the pension system in the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F04274644%3A_____%2F23%3A%230001066" target="_blank" >RIV/04274644:_____/23:#0001066 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://economics.cifra.science/en/archive/3-3-2023-november" target="_blank" >https://economics.cifra.science/en/archive/3-3-2023-november</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.23670/ECNMS.2023.3.3" target="_blank" >10.23670/ECNMS.2023.3.3</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Positional investing and reforms in the socio-economic sphere on the example of the pension system in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper focuses on the distinction between two types of reforms (or reforms and anti-reforms) using the tools of positional investment analysis: a) reforms that solve the problem by moving society to a "higher level" of dynamic, environmentally friendly and human-oriented economic development (where the development of human capabilities is the most significant factor of economic growth), in which mutual trust between those who govern the country and those who live in the country grows; b) anti-reforms ("people's reforms") that block positive changes in the development of society, demotivate the population, exacerbate relations within society, and open up space for positional investment by domestic and foreign lobbies, i.e., space for the transformation of already acquired property and positional advantages into an even greater redistribution of the wealth created in their favour. Current events in the Czech Republic, using the concrete example of pension issues, allow us to demonstrate the importance of the tools of description and analysis of positional investing to clearly distinguish between reforms and anti-reforms.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Positional investing and reforms in the socio-economic sphere on the example of the pension system in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper focuses on the distinction between two types of reforms (or reforms and anti-reforms) using the tools of positional investment analysis: a) reforms that solve the problem by moving society to a "higher level" of dynamic, environmentally friendly and human-oriented economic development (where the development of human capabilities is the most significant factor of economic growth), in which mutual trust between those who govern the country and those who live in the country grows; b) anti-reforms ("people's reforms") that block positive changes in the development of society, demotivate the population, exacerbate relations within society, and open up space for positional investment by domestic and foreign lobbies, i.e., space for the transformation of already acquired property and positional advantages into an even greater redistribution of the wealth created in their favour. Current events in the Czech Republic, using the concrete example of pension issues, allow us to demonstrate the importance of the tools of description and analysis of positional investing to clearly distinguish between reforms and anti-reforms.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50201 - Economic Theory

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů