The quota debate in the Czech Republic and the post-communist legacy
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F19194951%3A_____%2F22%3AN0000004" target="_blank" >RIV/19194951:_____/22:N0000004 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14230/22:00129187
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539522000863" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539522000863</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102645" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102645</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The quota debate in the Czech Republic and the post-communist legacy
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Most countries currently use some type of legislative or voluntary party quota to increase women's descriptive representation. The Czech Republic, however, despite low female parliamentary representation and three unsuccessful legislative proposals, has never adopted any quota mechanism, and all relevant political parties are reluctant to use voluntary party quotas. The aim of this paper is to present the arguments employed in the Czech quota debate and identify the reasons for such attitudes. We study the quota debate based on elite attitudes through media analysis and interviews with politicians from across the political spectrum. We find that most politicians do not support quotas. The quota debate is dominated by liberal individualist discourses of quotas as "offensive and humiliating" and unable to solve the problem of underrepresentation caused by "women's lack of interest in electoral politics". We find that many women politicians internalize the dominant negative quota arguments which prevent them from requesting institutional change and pressing for quota measures in their own parties. We connect the findings with historical and political experiences that could provide important insights into quota reluctance in other post-communist countries.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The quota debate in the Czech Republic and the post-communist legacy
Popis výsledku anglicky
Most countries currently use some type of legislative or voluntary party quota to increase women's descriptive representation. The Czech Republic, however, despite low female parliamentary representation and three unsuccessful legislative proposals, has never adopted any quota mechanism, and all relevant political parties are reluctant to use voluntary party quotas. The aim of this paper is to present the arguments employed in the Czech quota debate and identify the reasons for such attitudes. We study the quota debate based on elite attitudes through media analysis and interviews with politicians from across the political spectrum. We find that most politicians do not support quotas. The quota debate is dominated by liberal individualist discourses of quotas as "offensive and humiliating" and unable to solve the problem of underrepresentation caused by "women's lack of interest in electoral politics". We find that many women politicians internalize the dominant negative quota arguments which prevent them from requesting institutional change and pressing for quota measures in their own parties. We connect the findings with historical and political experiences that could provide important insights into quota reluctance in other post-communist countries.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA21-33896S" target="_blank" >GA21-33896S: Ženy jako občané a politici v Evropě</a><br>
Návaznosti
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Women's Studies International Forum
ISSN
0277-5395
e-ISSN
1879-243X
Svazek periodika
95
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
November–December 2022
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
1-9
Kód UT WoS článku
000869021000001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85138798461