Riots, Civil Resistance, and External Intervention in the Failed 2022 Kazakhstan Revolution

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F19194951%3A_____%2F24%3AN0000020" target="_blank" >RIV/19194951:_____/24:N0000020 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://brill.com/view/journals/spsr/51/3/article-p299_4.xml" target="_blank" >https://brill.com/view/journals/spsr/51/3/article-p299_4.xml</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.30965/18763324-05103002" target="_blank" >10.30965/18763324-05103002</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Riots, Civil Resistance, and External Intervention in the Failed 2022 Kazakhstan Revolution

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Research on revolution commonly focuses on successful regime transition. While useful for understanding historical change, analyses of positive outcomes tend to select on the dependent variable. This study turns attention to a negative case in the context of Kazakhstan—a polity that had experienced political stability for three decades until a small-scale set of protests against fuel prices spread nationally. Protesters implemented a heterogeneous collection of strategies ranging from civil disobedience to unarmed violence and violence. Key political structures and institutions were taken over including state buildings, police stations, as well as an international airport. In response, the government utilized severe state repression which failed and led to the incumbent calling upon the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) to intervene with troops. In spite of achieving tactical advantages and spurring defection, the movement was suppressed by the CSTO which can be attributed to disorganization and a lack of unified leadership.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Riots, Civil Resistance, and External Intervention in the Failed 2022 Kazakhstan Revolution

Popis výsledku anglicky

Research on revolution commonly focuses on successful regime transition. While useful for understanding historical change, analyses of positive outcomes tend to select on the dependent variable. This study turns attention to a negative case in the context of Kazakhstan—a polity that had experienced political stability for three decades until a small-scale set of protests against fuel prices spread nationally. Protesters implemented a heterogeneous collection of strategies ranging from civil disobedience to unarmed violence and violence. Key political structures and institutions were taken over including state buildings, police stations, as well as an international airport. In response, the government utilized severe state repression which failed and led to the incumbent calling upon the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) to intervene with troops. In spite of achieving tactical advantages and spurring defection, the movement was suppressed by the CSTO which can be attributed to disorganization and a lack of unified leadership.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review

ISSN

1075-1262

e-ISSN

1876-3324

Svazek periodika

51

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

23

Strana od-do

299–321

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85210040940