Evaluating LDA and PLS-DA Algorithms for Food Authentication: A Chemometric Perspective
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F25271121%3A_____%2F25%3AN0000107" target="_blank" >RIV/25271121:_____/25:N0000107 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/18/12/733" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/18/12/733</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/a18120733" target="_blank" >10.3390/a18120733</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Evaluating LDA and PLS-DA Algorithms for Food Authentication: A Chemometric Perspective
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
High-dimensional analytical datasets, such as those generated by inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), require robust computational frameworks for dimensionality reduction, classification, and model validation. This study presents a comparative evaluation of Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) algorithms applied to multivariate chemometric data for food origin authentication. The research employs a workflow that integrates Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for feature extraction, followed by supervised classification using LDA and PLS-DA. Model performance and stability were systematically assessed. The dataset comprised 28 apple samples from four geographical regions and was processed with normalization, scaling, and transformation prior to modeling. Each model was validated via leave-one-out cross-validation and evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy, detection prevalence, p-value, and Cohen’s Kappa. The results demonstrate that, as a linear projection-based classifier, LDA provides higher robustness and interpretability in small and unbalanced datasets. In contrast, PLS-DA, which is optimized for covariance maximization, exhibits higher apparent sensitivity but lower reproducibility under similar conditions. The study also emphasizes the importance of dimensionality reduction strategies, such as PCA-based variable selection versus latent space extraction in PLS-DA, in controlling overfitting and improving model generalizability. The proposed algorithmic workflow provides a reproducible and statistically sound approach for evaluating discriminant methods in chemometric classification.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Evaluating LDA and PLS-DA Algorithms for Food Authentication: A Chemometric Perspective
Popis výsledku anglicky
High-dimensional analytical datasets, such as those generated by inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), require robust computational frameworks for dimensionality reduction, classification, and model validation. This study presents a comparative evaluation of Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) algorithms applied to multivariate chemometric data for food origin authentication. The research employs a workflow that integrates Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for feature extraction, followed by supervised classification using LDA and PLS-DA. Model performance and stability were systematically assessed. The dataset comprised 28 apple samples from four geographical regions and was processed with normalization, scaling, and transformation prior to modeling. Each model was validated via leave-one-out cross-validation and evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy, detection prevalence, p-value, and Cohen’s Kappa. The results demonstrate that, as a linear projection-based classifier, LDA provides higher robustness and interpretability in small and unbalanced datasets. In contrast, PLS-DA, which is optimized for covariance maximization, exhibits higher apparent sensitivity but lower reproducibility under similar conditions. The study also emphasizes the importance of dimensionality reduction strategies, such as PCA-based variable selection versus latent space extraction in PLS-DA, in controlling overfitting and improving model generalizability. The proposed algorithmic workflow provides a reproducible and statistically sound approach for evaluating discriminant methods in chemometric classification.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/QK1910104" target="_blank" >QK1910104: Výzkum metabolomických metod pro laboratorní ověření geografické autenticity jablek.</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Algorithms
ISSN
1999-4893
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
18
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
12
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
733
Kód UT WoS článku
001645957800001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105025898412