Comparison of Software and Common Used Visual Method of Segregation Evaluation in Wire Rod

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F25870807%3A_____%2F16%3AN0000008" target="_blank" >RIV/25870807:_____/16:N0000008 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.edhanpublisning.com" target="_blank" >http://www.edhanpublisning.com</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of Software and Common Used Visual Method of Segregation Evaluation in Wire Rod

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper presents a method for software assessing of level of axial segregation in wire rod. This so-called axial segregation is routinely determined visually as dark spots on the etched cross-section of wire, which classifies comparison to an etalon. The result is a class of characterizing the degree of segregation in the axial wire. The disadvantage of the visual evaluation is considerable subjectivity in evaluating particularly borderline levels of segregation and mere only categorial variable characterizing the degree of segregation. Software evaluation eliminates these drawbacks. The evaluation algorithm still works in the same way and the output is a quantitative variable, which can be further processed statistically. Measurement is faster, more accurate and more objective. Comparison between software and common used visual method of segregation evaluation in wire rod is also presented.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of Software and Common Used Visual Method of Segregation Evaluation in Wire Rod

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper presents a method for software assessing of level of axial segregation in wire rod. This so-called axial segregation is routinely determined visually as dark spots on the etched cross-section of wire, which classifies comparison to an etalon. The result is a class of characterizing the degree of segregation in the axial wire. The disadvantage of the visual evaluation is considerable subjectivity in evaluating particularly borderline levels of segregation and mere only categorial variable characterizing the degree of segregation. Software evaluation eliminates these drawbacks. The evaluation algorithm still works in the same way and the output is a quantitative variable, which can be further processed statistically. Measurement is faster, more accurate and more objective. Comparison between software and common used visual method of segregation evaluation in wire rod is also presented.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

JG - Hutnictví, kovové materiály

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LO1203" target="_blank" >LO1203: Regionální materiálově technologické výzkumné centrum - Program udržitelnosti</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Automation

ISSN

2333-9179

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

3

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

71-75

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—