Transitions, populism, and democratic decline: evidence from Hungary and the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F25940082%3A_____%2F23%3AN0000002" target="_blank" >RIV/25940082:_____/23:N0000002 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23745118.2021.1973213" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23745118.2021.1973213</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1973213" target="_blank" >10.1080/23745118.2021.1973213</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Transitions, populism, and democratic decline: evidence from Hungary and the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Although both Hungary and the Czech Republic have seen populists arrive in power over the past decade, only Hungary has experienced a measurable deterioration in the quality of its democratic institutions and rule of law. The different circumstances of the transition after 1989, particularly the differences in constitutional choices and transitional justice measures, help explain the cleavages, polarization, and erosion of trust that characterized Hungarian politics in the run-up to the 2010 election. Jointly with a highly disproportionate electoral system, these structural factors made Hungary more prone to the de-democratization observed under Viktor Orbán than the Czech Republic.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Transitions, populism, and democratic decline: evidence from Hungary and the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

Although both Hungary and the Czech Republic have seen populists arrive in power over the past decade, only Hungary has experienced a measurable deterioration in the quality of its democratic institutions and rule of law. The different circumstances of the transition after 1989, particularly the differences in constitutional choices and transitional justice measures, help explain the cleavages, polarization, and erosion of trust that characterized Hungarian politics in the run-up to the 2010 election. Jointly with a highly disproportionate electoral system, these structural factors made Hungary more prone to the de-democratization observed under Viktor Orbán than the Czech Republic.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-14654S" target="_blank" >GA19-14654S: Ústup demokracie v postkomunistických a muslimských zemích z pohledu institucionalismu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Politics and Society

ISSN

2374-5118

e-ISSN

2374-5126

Svazek periodika

24

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

169-187

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85114489438