Impact of Maize Harvest Techniques on Biomethane Production
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26296080%3A_____%2F21%3AN0000016" target="_blank" >RIV/26296080:_____/21:N0000016 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/62156489:43210/21:43918115 RIV/00216224:14310/21:00121002
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0" target="_blank" >10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Impact of Maize Harvest Techniques on Biomethane Production
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Many farms run livestock production along with a biogas plant. Priority is the effort to prepare high-quality feed and high-quality feedstock for the biogas plant. However, deciding which harvesting technique to choose seems a difficult task. In this study, the influence of harvest technique on silage quality and thus on the methane yield during anaerobic digestion was investigated. Maize was harvested for silage and shredlage production. Two-year results showed that the chemical composition of water leachate from silage and the total solids content did not indicate any significant differences between maize silage and shredlage. Methane yield in the first year ranged from 0.2735 ± 0.0095 m3/kgVS (maize silage) to 0.3024 ± 0.0090 m3/kgVS (shredlage) and in the second year from 0.3047 ± 0.0110 m3/kgVS (maize silage) to 0.3147 ± 0.0086 m3/kgVS (shredlage). Methane concentration in biogas did not show any significant differences for the two types of harvesting techniques in both years. The results showed that harvest technique had no additional effect on the methane content in biogas and thus on the methane yield.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Impact of Maize Harvest Techniques on Biomethane Production
Popis výsledku anglicky
Many farms run livestock production along with a biogas plant. Priority is the effort to prepare high-quality feed and high-quality feedstock for the biogas plant. However, deciding which harvesting technique to choose seems a difficult task. In this study, the influence of harvest technique on silage quality and thus on the methane yield during anaerobic digestion was investigated. Maize was harvested for silage and shredlage production. Two-year results showed that the chemical composition of water leachate from silage and the total solids content did not indicate any significant differences between maize silage and shredlage. Methane yield in the first year ranged from 0.2735 ± 0.0095 m3/kgVS (maize silage) to 0.3024 ± 0.0090 m3/kgVS (shredlage) and in the second year from 0.3047 ± 0.0110 m3/kgVS (maize silage) to 0.3147 ± 0.0086 m3/kgVS (shredlage). Methane concentration in biogas did not show any significant differences for the two types of harvesting techniques in both years. The results showed that harvest technique had no additional effect on the methane content in biogas and thus on the methane yield.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
40101 - Agriculture
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
BIOENERGY RESEARCH
ISSN
1939-1234
e-ISSN
1939-1242
Svazek periodika
14
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
303-312
Kód UT WoS článku
000554441500001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85088833788