The Peerage of Tudor Ireland in Modern Historiography (1945-present)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F12%3A%230000274" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/12:#0000274 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Peerage of Tudor Ireland in Modern Historiography (1945-present)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This essay explores the place of the Tudor nobility ? or peerage ? in modern and contemporary Irish historiography. It argues that, in contrast to Britain and continental Europe, scholars of sixteenth-century Ireland have overlooked the collective significance of the nobility in favour of other themes and perspectives. This lacuna may be related to the fact that extensive aristocratic records have not survived; but it may also be a reflection of a present-centred preoccupation with the theme of hostileAnglo-Irish relations, which made the institution of the peerage (together with its strong connections with the English monarchy) appear less helpful and important. Moreover, the insularity of Irish historiography meant that Irish historians were slow toembrace British and Continental theories on the medieval and early modern aristocracy. On the other side of the Irish Sea, historians of Tudor England did not consider the peerage of Ireland to be part of English history ? even though Ir

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Peerage of Tudor Ireland in Modern Historiography (1945-present)

Popis výsledku anglicky

This essay explores the place of the Tudor nobility ? or peerage ? in modern and contemporary Irish historiography. It argues that, in contrast to Britain and continental Europe, scholars of sixteenth-century Ireland have overlooked the collective significance of the nobility in favour of other themes and perspectives. This lacuna may be related to the fact that extensive aristocratic records have not survived; but it may also be a reflection of a present-centred preoccupation with the theme of hostileAnglo-Irish relations, which made the institution of the peerage (together with its strong connections with the English monarchy) appear less helpful and important. Moreover, the insularity of Irish historiography meant that Irish historians were slow toembrace British and Continental theories on the medieval and early modern aristocracy. On the other side of the Irish Sea, historians of Tudor England did not consider the peerage of Ireland to be part of English history ? even though Ir

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AB - Dějiny

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

The Twentieth Century ? Dvacáté století

ISSN

1803-750X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2012

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

13-22

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—