Apportionment amongst Member States and the Value of a Vote in the 2014 European Parliamentary Elections
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F15%3A%230000606" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/15:#0000606 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Apportionment amongst Member States and the Value of a Vote in the 2014 European Parliamentary Elections
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This quantitative analysis deals with the issue of the apportionment of seats in the European Parliament amongst the 28 Member States and its goal is to quantify the existing principle for allocating the EP seats, the so-called principle of degressive proportionality provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 14 (2) of the Treaty on European Union. The analysis employs quantitative tools commonly used in electoral analysis for measuring disproportionality of electoral rules (the discrepancy between seats and votes). At the individual (Member State) level, the paper finds both the value of a vote (the average size of population per seat) and how much each of the Member States overrepresented or underrepresented (by the advantage ratio measure). At the aggregate level for the whole European Parliament representation, the value of malapportionment is measured by the distortion index created by Loosemore and Hanby (1971), as it was earlier suggested as a suitable strategy for measur
Název v anglickém jazyce
Apportionment amongst Member States and the Value of a Vote in the 2014 European Parliamentary Elections
Popis výsledku anglicky
This quantitative analysis deals with the issue of the apportionment of seats in the European Parliament amongst the 28 Member States and its goal is to quantify the existing principle for allocating the EP seats, the so-called principle of degressive proportionality provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 14 (2) of the Treaty on European Union. The analysis employs quantitative tools commonly used in electoral analysis for measuring disproportionality of electoral rules (the discrepancy between seats and votes). At the individual (Member State) level, the paper finds both the value of a vote (the average size of population per seat) and how much each of the Member States overrepresented or underrepresented (by the advantage ratio measure). At the aggregate level for the whole European Parliament representation, the value of malapportionment is measured by the distortion index created by Loosemore and Hanby (1971), as it was earlier suggested as a suitable strategy for measur
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AD - Politologie a politické vědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Revista de Stiinte Politice. Revue des Sciences Politiques
ISSN
1584-224X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
48
Stát vydavatele periodika
RO - Rumunsko
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
179-190
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—