Does the Full Harmonization of the Consumers’ Protection against Unfair Commercial Practices via UCPD fit in Europe 2020?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F17%3AN0000009" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/17:N0000009 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://rozkotova.cld.bz/CYIL-vol-8-2017" target="_blank" >https://rozkotova.cld.bz/CYIL-vol-8-2017</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Does the Full Harmonization of the Consumers’ Protection against Unfair Commercial Practices via UCPD fit in Europe 2020?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Th e Post-Lisbon EU embraces the Europe 2020 strategy, which endorses smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth in the single internal market. Th e consumer protection against unfair commercial practices in this market has been, already for one decade, subject to a full harmonization via the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, UCPD. For a myriad of reasons, including national particularities and the balance of priorities, this move from minimum to full harmonization was and remains controversial. Th erefore, it is highly illustrative to research, analyze and assess the full harmonization eff ect of the UCPD in light of the Europe 2020 strategy, while exploring both primary and secondary sources of a multidisciplinary nature, including the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU. For seven years, the Europe 2020 and UCPD have been co-existing, so what kind of co-existence is that? Does the UCPD, with its full harmonization eff ect fi t in Europe 2020 or is it rather contra-productive with respect to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth?

Název v anglickém jazyce

Does the Full Harmonization of the Consumers’ Protection against Unfair Commercial Practices via UCPD fit in Europe 2020?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Th e Post-Lisbon EU embraces the Europe 2020 strategy, which endorses smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth in the single internal market. Th e consumer protection against unfair commercial practices in this market has been, already for one decade, subject to a full harmonization via the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, UCPD. For a myriad of reasons, including national particularities and the balance of priorities, this move from minimum to full harmonization was and remains controversial. Th erefore, it is highly illustrative to research, analyze and assess the full harmonization eff ect of the UCPD in light of the Europe 2020 strategy, while exploring both primary and secondary sources of a multidisciplinary nature, including the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU. For seven years, the Europe 2020 and UCPD have been co-existing, so what kind of co-existence is that? Does the UCPD, with its full harmonization eff ect fi t in Europe 2020 or is it rather contra-productive with respect to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth?

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA17-11867S" target="_blank" >GA17-11867S: Komparace interakce práva proti nekalé soutěži a práva duševního vlastnictví a její důsledky ve středoevropském kontextu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Czech Yearbook of International Law - CYIL

ISSN

1805-0565

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

8

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

223-232

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85041030347