Hopes of Derrida’s Reading? On Emergence of Peirce’s Texts in the Poststructuralist Context

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F17%3AN0000011" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/17:N0000011 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Hopes of Derrida’s Reading? On Emergence of Peirce’s Texts in the Poststructuralist Context

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The chapter focuses on the problem of divergent (and eventually misleading) interpretations of Ch. S. Peirce’s texts presented by leading philosophical figures of the ‘70 and the ’80, such as Jacques Derrida, Gilles Deleuze and Umberto Eco. The poststructuralist re-discovery of Peirce’s semiotics seemed to be a possible “cure” for the totalitarian “disease” of structuralism. Trying to find a way out of “dying” structuralism, the poststructuralists upraised Peirce to one of the main sources of their philosophical inspiration. Thanks to them, Peirce became an attractive, frequent and influential reading for various contemporary semioticians of photographic image, like Rosalind Krauss, Thierry de Duve, Henri Van Lier or Jean-Marie Schaeffer. According to the author’s claim, this situation gave birth to various poststructuralist interpretations that made up Peirce’s texts in order to fit it in poststructuralist context of thinking. On the example of Derrida’s reading of Peirce, the paper analysis poststructuralist intentions, expectations and hopes that shaped these interpretations. Finally, the author points out several distinctions between Peirce’s semiotics and semiotics of poststructuralism (that should be seen as eventual reasons for poststructuralist disappointment by Peirce’s metaphysics).

Název v anglickém jazyce

Hopes of Derrida’s Reading? On Emergence of Peirce’s Texts in the Poststructuralist Context

Popis výsledku anglicky

The chapter focuses on the problem of divergent (and eventually misleading) interpretations of Ch. S. Peirce’s texts presented by leading philosophical figures of the ‘70 and the ’80, such as Jacques Derrida, Gilles Deleuze and Umberto Eco. The poststructuralist re-discovery of Peirce’s semiotics seemed to be a possible “cure” for the totalitarian “disease” of structuralism. Trying to find a way out of “dying” structuralism, the poststructuralists upraised Peirce to one of the main sources of their philosophical inspiration. Thanks to them, Peirce became an attractive, frequent and influential reading for various contemporary semioticians of photographic image, like Rosalind Krauss, Thierry de Duve, Henri Van Lier or Jean-Marie Schaeffer. According to the author’s claim, this situation gave birth to various poststructuralist interpretations that made up Peirce’s texts in order to fit it in poststructuralist context of thinking. On the example of Derrida’s reading of Peirce, the paper analysis poststructuralist intentions, expectations and hopes that shaped these interpretations. Finally, the author points out several distinctions between Peirce’s semiotics and semiotics of poststructuralism (that should be seen as eventual reasons for poststructuralist disappointment by Peirce’s metaphysics).

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GP14-14237P" target="_blank" >GP14-14237P: Dekonstrukce podpisu : metafyzická dimenze legální mediační politiky</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

How to Make Our Signs Clear: C. S. Peirce and Semiotics

ISBN

9789004347786

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

119-133

Počet stran knihy

172

Název nakladatele

Brill

Místo vydání

Leiden

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—