One for All But Yet All Alone: Analysing post-Soviet System of Collective Security

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F17%3AN0000056" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/17:N0000056 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5MxrnqjVlZrcE1HVldlVVU4Xy1RZTVRbE5uTzA0enBDTWdv/view" target="_blank" >https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5MxrnqjVlZrcE1HVldlVVU4Xy1RZTVRbE5uTzA0enBDTWdv/view</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

One for All But Yet All Alone: Analysing post-Soviet System of Collective Security

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 allowed independent states, which emerged in its place, to construct their own alignments. The choice of the case for empirical analysis had been made due to several unique characteristics. Orthodox Alliance Theory had almost never properly addressed alignments in the post-Soviet space due to the lack of the access to information during the Soviet period – along with the structure of state: only Soviet alignment policies were taken into consideration, less of its constituent republics – and modest interest to the region on the side of alliance theorists. Continued disintegration of the post-Soviet space, which has not broken off with the collapse of the Soviet Union but keep fragmenting further, creates a unique setting for researching adequacy of Alliance Theory’s classic assumptions as well as developing new approaches. This work traces the development of the post-Soviet system of collective security and its subsequent transformation into a series of bilateral security relations, along with the shortfall of multilateralism.

Název v anglickém jazyce

One for All But Yet All Alone: Analysing post-Soviet System of Collective Security

Popis výsledku anglicky

The fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 allowed independent states, which emerged in its place, to construct their own alignments. The choice of the case for empirical analysis had been made due to several unique characteristics. Orthodox Alliance Theory had almost never properly addressed alignments in the post-Soviet space due to the lack of the access to information during the Soviet period – along with the structure of state: only Soviet alignment policies were taken into consideration, less of its constituent republics – and modest interest to the region on the side of alliance theorists. Continued disintegration of the post-Soviet space, which has not broken off with the collapse of the Soviet Union but keep fragmenting further, creates a unique setting for researching adequacy of Alliance Theory’s classic assumptions as well as developing new approaches. This work traces the development of the post-Soviet system of collective security and its subsequent transformation into a series of bilateral security relations, along with the shortfall of multilateralism.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Regional Security

ISSN

2217-995X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

RS - Srbská republika

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

88-110

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—