The Visegrad Cooperation in the Context of Other Central European Cooperation Formats

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F18%3AN0000120" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/18:N0000120 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11230/18:10386141

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.politicsincentraleurope.eu/documents/file/VISEGRAD_us_CELEK.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.politicsincentraleurope.eu/documents/file/VISEGRAD_us_CELEK.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/pce-2018-0014" target="_blank" >10.2478/pce-2018-0014</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Visegrad Cooperation in the Context of Other Central European Cooperation Formats

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This study considers the plethora of contemporary institutional frameworks for Central European cooperation. While the Visegrad Group has been the most visible and stable format for Central European cooperation in recent history, it has been challenged by a number of alternative or complementary projects. These include the Austrian concept of Strategic/Regional Partnership, the Austrian–Czech–Slovak project Austerlitz–Formate/Nord-Trilaterale, the Polish–Croatian Three Seas Initiative and the European Union’s macro-regional Strategy for the Danube Region (EUSDR). I focus on the development and prospects of each of these projects as well the rivalries among them and their intersections ot interference with one another. This survey then turns to the future Central European constellations suggested by the very different cooperation trajectories within the region. My thesis is that the region’s identity has been challenged by offers to merge with Europe’s West. Central European cooperation must find new challenges and themes if it is to survive.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Visegrad Cooperation in the Context of Other Central European Cooperation Formats

Popis výsledku anglicky

This study considers the plethora of contemporary institutional frameworks for Central European cooperation. While the Visegrad Group has been the most visible and stable format for Central European cooperation in recent history, it has been challenged by a number of alternative or complementary projects. These include the Austrian concept of Strategic/Regional Partnership, the Austrian–Czech–Slovak project Austerlitz–Formate/Nord-Trilaterale, the Polish–Croatian Three Seas Initiative and the European Union’s macro-regional Strategy for the Danube Region (EUSDR). I focus on the development and prospects of each of these projects as well the rivalries among them and their intersections ot interference with one another. This survey then turns to the future Central European constellations suggested by the very different cooperation trajectories within the region. My thesis is that the region’s identity has been challenged by offers to merge with Europe’s West. Central European cooperation must find new challenges and themes if it is to survive.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Politics in Central Europe

ISSN

1801-3422

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

165-179

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85059612726