Pan-European Constituency and Transnational Lists: The Third Wave of the EU Politics of Electoral Reform?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F19%3AN0000081" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/19:N0000081 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/842117.pdf" target="_blank" >https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/842117.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Pan-European Constituency and Transnational Lists: The Third Wave of the EU Politics of Electoral Reform?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Brexit raised a question of reapportionment of the 73 British seats in the European Parliament in the 2019 elections. This reopened the possibility of introducing a single pan-European constituency with transnational lists as a second tier of the European Parliament electoral system. The idea of transnational (pan-European) lists has not been new at all as it was firstly suggested by the Anastassopoulos report in 1998 as a tool how to make the European elections more European. Since then, this issue has been regularly appearing in discussions on the European Parliament electoral reform. Although the transnational lists were finally rejected in the most recent bargains about the European Parliament electoral design they seem to be a relevant issue for the future reform deliberation. Thus, the paper discusses the historical background and the political context of the most recent debates taking place in the context of the EU politics of electoral reform, whereby the essence is a proposal to introduce transnational lists within a pan-European constituency for the election of part of MEPs.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Pan-European Constituency and Transnational Lists: The Third Wave of the EU Politics of Electoral Reform?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Brexit raised a question of reapportionment of the 73 British seats in the European Parliament in the 2019 elections. This reopened the possibility of introducing a single pan-European constituency with transnational lists as a second tier of the European Parliament electoral system. The idea of transnational (pan-European) lists has not been new at all as it was firstly suggested by the Anastassopoulos report in 1998 as a tool how to make the European elections more European. Since then, this issue has been regularly appearing in discussions on the European Parliament electoral reform. Although the transnational lists were finally rejected in the most recent bargains about the European Parliament electoral design they seem to be a relevant issue for the future reform deliberation. Thus, the paper discusses the historical background and the political context of the most recent debates taking place in the context of the EU politics of electoral reform, whereby the essence is a proposal to introduce transnational lists within a pan-European constituency for the election of part of MEPs.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA18-09161S" target="_blank" >GA18-09161S: Zastoupení evropských občanů? Geografie evropských voleb, degresivní proporcionalita a zastoupení členských zemí v EP</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Revista de Stiinte Politice/Revue des Sciences Politiques

ISSN

1584-224X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

1

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

61

Stát vydavatele periodika

RO - Rumunsko

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

24-33

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—