A comparison of the EU external energy relations with Angola and Tanzania

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F20%3AN0000008" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/20:N0000008 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41311-020-00253-5" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41311-020-00253-5</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00253-5" target="_blank" >10.1057/s41311-020-00253-5</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A comparison of the EU external energy relations with Angola and Tanzania

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The main aim of the article is to compare the energy relations of the EU with current(here represented by Angola) and potential energy-resource suppliers (here represented by Tanzania) in Sub-Saharan Africa in 2007–2018. In this article, the external actorness of the EU in its energy relations is analysed and specified based on a set of predefined criteria of a modified concept: (1) external recognition of the EU energy actorness by third parties; (2) goals and interests of EU energy policy; and (3) instruments and resources of EU energy policy. The criteria are then applied to two case studies focused on Angola and Tanzania in order to demonstrate whether the EU can be considered as an actor in regard to these two Sub-Saharan Africa countries. While Angola does not recognize the EU as an energy actor, Tanzania meets all of the requirements for the recognition of EU energy actorness.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A comparison of the EU external energy relations with Angola and Tanzania

Popis výsledku anglicky

The main aim of the article is to compare the energy relations of the EU with current(here represented by Angola) and potential energy-resource suppliers (here represented by Tanzania) in Sub-Saharan Africa in 2007–2018. In this article, the external actorness of the EU in its energy relations is analysed and specified based on a set of predefined criteria of a modified concept: (1) external recognition of the EU energy actorness by third parties; (2) goals and interests of EU energy policy; and (3) instruments and resources of EU energy policy. The criteria are then applied to two case studies focused on Angola and Tanzania in order to demonstrate whether the EU can be considered as an actor in regard to these two Sub-Saharan Africa countries. While Angola does not recognize the EU as an energy actor, Tanzania meets all of the requirements for the recognition of EU energy actorness.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Politics

ISSN

1384-5748

e-ISSN

1740-3898

Svazek periodika

58

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

301–319

Kód UT WoS článku

000544234200001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85086871288