Continuity and Change: American Foreign Policy in the Era of Donald Trump through the Lens of Role Theory
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F21%3A10152336" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/21:10152336 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.politickevedy.fpvmv.umb.sk/app/cmsFile.php?disposition=a&ID=19245" target="_blank" >http://www.politickevedy.fpvmv.umb.sk/app/cmsFile.php?disposition=a&ID=19245</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2021.24.2.125-146" target="_blank" >10.24040/politickevedy.2021.24.2.125-146</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Continuity and Change: American Foreign Policy in the Era of Donald Trump through the Lens of Role Theory
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Since Donald Trump's inauguration in the office, there have appeared many articles dealing with changes and shifts in the American foreign policy (see, for example Ikenberry 2018; Drezner 2019 or Jervis et al. 2018). There have been ongoing discussions, whether and to what degree the rhetoric of Donald Trump really corresponded with his political actions and whether and to what degree the American foreign policy had really changed. This article tried to contribute to this debate by applying the role theory approach to determine the changes and continuity in the American foreign policy. Using the Holsti's (1970) and Le Prestre's (1997) approach to role theory, it examined the changes in the American national role conceptions. The article aimed at detecting key categories of national role conceptions under Harry Truman's and Donald Trump's administration. The obtained results from these two eras were compared and subsequently evaluated through statistical analysis. The results show that despite some minor changes, national role conceptions which define and stabilize the political actions of the USA in the international system, were similar both in Harry Truman and Donald Trump era. These findings may support the assertions of the authors who argue that the American foreign policy shows some distinct similar traits in the long run. Further research may be aimed at detailed discourse analysis of national roles, which may provide more detailed insight in the development of the respective national roles.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Continuity and Change: American Foreign Policy in the Era of Donald Trump through the Lens of Role Theory
Popis výsledku anglicky
Since Donald Trump's inauguration in the office, there have appeared many articles dealing with changes and shifts in the American foreign policy (see, for example Ikenberry 2018; Drezner 2019 or Jervis et al. 2018). There have been ongoing discussions, whether and to what degree the rhetoric of Donald Trump really corresponded with his political actions and whether and to what degree the American foreign policy had really changed. This article tried to contribute to this debate by applying the role theory approach to determine the changes and continuity in the American foreign policy. Using the Holsti's (1970) and Le Prestre's (1997) approach to role theory, it examined the changes in the American national role conceptions. The article aimed at detecting key categories of national role conceptions under Harry Truman's and Donald Trump's administration. The obtained results from these two eras were compared and subsequently evaluated through statistical analysis. The results show that despite some minor changes, national role conceptions which define and stabilize the political actions of the USA in the international system, were similar both in Harry Truman and Donald Trump era. These findings may support the assertions of the authors who argue that the American foreign policy shows some distinct similar traits in the long run. Further research may be aimed at detailed discourse analysis of national roles, which may provide more detailed insight in the development of the respective national roles.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Politické vedy
ISSN
1335-2741
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
24
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2/2021
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
22
Strana od-do
125-146
Kód UT WoS článku
000705842600004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—