Non-Aligned Good Power? Status Enhancement of Early Post-Independence Kazakhstan

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F22%3A10152194" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/22:10152194 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02634937.2021.1996334?scroll=top&needAccess=true" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02634937.2021.1996334?scroll=top&needAccess=true</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2021.1996334" target="_blank" >10.1080/02634937.2021.1996334</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Non-Aligned Good Power? Status Enhancement of Early Post-Independence Kazakhstan

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Drawing on the rigorous reading of Social Identity Theory (SIT), this paper reconstruct the ideational sources of Kazakhstan&apos;s status seeking by identifying the Kazakhstani perception of the (un)fairness of the international system, and the nature of the existing hierarchies in world society. By using the fine-tuned ideal types of status enhancement strategies as the basis of the coding scheme, qualitative content analysis of Kazakhstan&apos;s first president&apos;s speeches and the texts reveals that Nazarbayev adopted a social cooperation strategy. He perceived the international system as permeable, although rather unfair, but nevertheless open for improvement through multilateral cooperation. Nazarbayev accepted the negative results of comparison and responded with an adequate agency. He cultivated special niche of foreign policy as a champion of nuclear nonproliferation, and a place for open and constructive dialogue. Therefore, Kazakhstan projected itself as a doctrineless good power, without an alignment to a particular great power.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Non-Aligned Good Power? Status Enhancement of Early Post-Independence Kazakhstan

Popis výsledku anglicky

Drawing on the rigorous reading of Social Identity Theory (SIT), this paper reconstruct the ideational sources of Kazakhstan&apos;s status seeking by identifying the Kazakhstani perception of the (un)fairness of the international system, and the nature of the existing hierarchies in world society. By using the fine-tuned ideal types of status enhancement strategies as the basis of the coding scheme, qualitative content analysis of Kazakhstan&apos;s first president&apos;s speeches and the texts reveals that Nazarbayev adopted a social cooperation strategy. He perceived the international system as permeable, although rather unfair, but nevertheless open for improvement through multilateral cooperation. Nazarbayev accepted the negative results of comparison and responded with an adequate agency. He cultivated special niche of foreign policy as a champion of nuclear nonproliferation, and a place for open and constructive dialogue. Therefore, Kazakhstan projected itself as a doctrineless good power, without an alignment to a particular great power.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Central Asian Survey

ISSN

0263-4937

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

41

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

553-570

Kód UT WoS článku

000724603800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85120648674