Global assemblage of the responsibility to protect

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F22%3A10152381" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/22:10152381 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14747731.2022.2065724?scroll=top&needAccess=true&role=tab" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14747731.2022.2065724?scroll=top&needAccess=true&role=tab</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2065724" target="_blank" >10.1080/14747731.2022.2065724</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Global assemblage of the responsibility to protect

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article aims to contribute to ongoing debates on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and demonstrate how it became a powerful global assemblage. It challenges the existing perspectives that R2P constituted a robust international norm. In contrast to the (critical) social constructivist reading of R2P, I argue that R2P was assembled, stabilized, and revitalized through specific practices conducted within complex advocacy-knowledge-diplomacy networks. On the theoretical level, the article demonstrates that assemblage thinking provides a useful framework to trace the dynamic R2P&apos;s existence constructed by heterogeneous entities and their relations. On the empirical level, it analyses how R2P emanated from the 2001 original report, how it gained relevance in the UN debates and how it endured the spectacular failures in Libya, Syria, and Myanmar. The resilience of R2P is not an inherent quality of the concept, it needs to be understood as a practical arrangement of its proponents.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Global assemblage of the responsibility to protect

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article aims to contribute to ongoing debates on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and demonstrate how it became a powerful global assemblage. It challenges the existing perspectives that R2P constituted a robust international norm. In contrast to the (critical) social constructivist reading of R2P, I argue that R2P was assembled, stabilized, and revitalized through specific practices conducted within complex advocacy-knowledge-diplomacy networks. On the theoretical level, the article demonstrates that assemblage thinking provides a useful framework to trace the dynamic R2P&apos;s existence constructed by heterogeneous entities and their relations. On the empirical level, it analyses how R2P emanated from the 2001 original report, how it gained relevance in the UN debates and how it endured the spectacular failures in Libya, Syria, and Myanmar. The resilience of R2P is not an inherent quality of the concept, it needs to be understood as a practical arrangement of its proponents.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA20-07805S" target="_blank" >GA20-07805S: Dynamika sociálních norem v mezinárodním řádu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Globalizations

ISSN

1474-7731

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

8/2022

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

1328-1345

Kód UT WoS článku

000795960200001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85129977768