TERRORISM DISCOURSE AND EMOTIONS: AUSTRALIA

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F24%3A10152690" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/24:10152690 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://politickevedy.fpvmv.umb.sk/26049/terrorism-discourse-and-emotions-australia" target="_blank" >https://politickevedy.fpvmv.umb.sk/26049/terrorism-discourse-and-emotions-australia</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2024.27.2.55-79" target="_blank" >10.24040/politickevedy.2024.27.2.55-79</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

TERRORISM DISCOURSE AND EMOTIONS: AUSTRALIA

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Terrorism has been often considered to be a subjective label rather than a distinct form ofviolence. Discourse has played an important role in creating the threat of terrorism, as well asin the legitimisation of counterterrorism level. The importance of studying discourse can thusno longer be denied. This article analysed the character of official discourse on terrorismdelivered by Australian prime ministers between 9/11 and the end of 2019, since Australia isone of the countries involved in the War on Terror. The author used the NVivo software toanalyse speeches delivered by John Howard, Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard, Tony Abbott, ScottMorrison, and Malcolm Turnbull. She applies Norman Fairclough&apos;s three-level CriticalDiscourse Analysis to study the character of the speeches, positive and negative emotionswhich were invoked by the speeches and the connections that were drawn to otherdiscourses. She also analyses the context in which the speeches were delivered as well asthe adopted counterterrorism measures that were legitimized in the speeches. The results ofthe analysis demonstrated that all Australian prime ministers used the terrorism label to someextent, however each of them delivered speeches on terrorism that had a different character.All of the analysed prime ministers, with the exception of Kevin Rudd, also presentedemotional discourse on terrorism. The article demonstrates how is the terrorism labelportrayed differently by each speaker, and that not all discourse on terrorism has tonecessarily be emotional.

Název v anglickém jazyce

TERRORISM DISCOURSE AND EMOTIONS: AUSTRALIA

Popis výsledku anglicky

Terrorism has been often considered to be a subjective label rather than a distinct form ofviolence. Discourse has played an important role in creating the threat of terrorism, as well asin the legitimisation of counterterrorism level. The importance of studying discourse can thusno longer be denied. This article analysed the character of official discourse on terrorismdelivered by Australian prime ministers between 9/11 and the end of 2019, since Australia isone of the countries involved in the War on Terror. The author used the NVivo software toanalyse speeches delivered by John Howard, Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard, Tony Abbott, ScottMorrison, and Malcolm Turnbull. She applies Norman Fairclough&apos;s three-level CriticalDiscourse Analysis to study the character of the speeches, positive and negative emotionswhich were invoked by the speeches and the connections that were drawn to otherdiscourses. She also analyses the context in which the speeches were delivered as well asthe adopted counterterrorism measures that were legitimized in the speeches. The results ofthe analysis demonstrated that all Australian prime ministers used the terrorism label to someextent, however each of them delivered speeches on terrorism that had a different character.All of the analysed prime ministers, with the exception of Kevin Rudd, also presentedemotional discourse on terrorism. The article demonstrates how is the terrorism labelportrayed differently by each speaker, and that not all discourse on terrorism has tonecessarily be emotional.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Politicke Vedy

ISSN

1335-2741

e-ISSN

1338-5623

Svazek periodika

27

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

55-79

Kód UT WoS článku

001292806800003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—