MILORAD DODIK'S METAMORPHOSIS AND THE HIJACKING OF THE DAYTON PEACE AGREEMENT
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F24%3A10152772" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/24:10152772 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://politickevedy.fpvmv.umb.sk/27129/milorad-dodik-s-metamorphosis-and-the-hijacking-of-the-dayton-peace-agreement" target="_blank" >https://politickevedy.fpvmv.umb.sk/27129/milorad-dodik-s-metamorphosis-and-the-hijacking-of-the-dayton-peace-agreement</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2024.27.4.6-41" target="_blank" >10.24040/politickevedy.2024.27.4.6-41</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
MILORAD DODIK'S METAMORPHOSIS AND THE HIJACKING OF THE DAYTON PEACE AGREEMENT
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) is currently facing a situation where the rule of law (whose promotion and strengthening is one of the European Union's main priorities in BiH and the wider Western Balkan region), has become an area for the further destabilization of the country's political and security situation by dominant local political actors, as the case of Milorad Dodik shows. The reactions of some International Community actors (eg, the High Representative Christian Schmidt), who aim to prevent further destabilisation, are subsequently questioned, as their (and their decisions') legitimacy is downplayed by local BiH actors and significant states (eg, China and the Russian Federation). The aim of this article was thus not only to examine the logic behind Dodik's long-term political strategy in BiH, but also to demonstrate his ability to subvert the system established by the Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA) via standard legislative procedure, for the sake of securing his own power position in the country's political environment. It also analyzes HR Schmidt's use of illiberal means to reach liberal outcomes, and his response to Dodik's activities of June and July 2023. The unique insights from thirty-nine personalized semi-structured interviews, which took place in parts of BiH (Sarajevo, Mostar, Banja Luka, and Tešanj) in May, June, October and November 2023, and January and February 2024, as part of the author's ethnographic research, are presented in the article. The interviewed individuals have backgrounds in academia, culture, media and local politics. The analysis demonstrates that Dodik's actions should be interpreted within the broader context of BiH's political landscape, where ethno-nationalism is intertwined with power distribution and formalized by the provisions outlined in the DPA. Although his secessionist rhetoric has intensified since 2021, Dodik's political strategy has pragmatic contours, which means that global geopolitical developments could play a more significant role in deepening the political crisis in BiH. A return to greater interventionism from current HR Schmidt is therefore not an adequate panacea for the country's ongoing political complexities.
Název v anglickém jazyce
MILORAD DODIK'S METAMORPHOSIS AND THE HIJACKING OF THE DAYTON PEACE AGREEMENT
Popis výsledku anglicky
Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) is currently facing a situation where the rule of law (whose promotion and strengthening is one of the European Union's main priorities in BiH and the wider Western Balkan region), has become an area for the further destabilization of the country's political and security situation by dominant local political actors, as the case of Milorad Dodik shows. The reactions of some International Community actors (eg, the High Representative Christian Schmidt), who aim to prevent further destabilisation, are subsequently questioned, as their (and their decisions') legitimacy is downplayed by local BiH actors and significant states (eg, China and the Russian Federation). The aim of this article was thus not only to examine the logic behind Dodik's long-term political strategy in BiH, but also to demonstrate his ability to subvert the system established by the Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA) via standard legislative procedure, for the sake of securing his own power position in the country's political environment. It also analyzes HR Schmidt's use of illiberal means to reach liberal outcomes, and his response to Dodik's activities of June and July 2023. The unique insights from thirty-nine personalized semi-structured interviews, which took place in parts of BiH (Sarajevo, Mostar, Banja Luka, and Tešanj) in May, June, October and November 2023, and January and February 2024, as part of the author's ethnographic research, are presented in the article. The interviewed individuals have backgrounds in academia, culture, media and local politics. The analysis demonstrates that Dodik's actions should be interpreted within the broader context of BiH's political landscape, where ethno-nationalism is intertwined with power distribution and formalized by the provisions outlined in the DPA. Although his secessionist rhetoric has intensified since 2021, Dodik's political strategy has pragmatic contours, which means that global geopolitical developments could play a more significant role in deepening the political crisis in BiH. A return to greater interventionism from current HR Schmidt is therefore not an adequate panacea for the country's ongoing political complexities.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Politické vedy
ISSN
1335-2741
e-ISSN
1338-5623
Svazek periodika
27
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
37
Strana od-do
6-41
Kód UT WoS článku
001454616300001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—