Selective adherence to EU values and the quest for external coherence: a comparative discourse analysis of Czechia, Hungary, and Norway Amid Russia's war in Ukraine
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F25%3A10152767" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/25:10152767 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14782804.2024.2382153" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14782804.2024.2382153</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2024.2382153" target="_blank" >10.1080/14782804.2024.2382153</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Selective adherence to EU values and the quest for external coherence: a comparative discourse analysis of Czechia, Hungary, and Norway Amid Russia's war in Ukraine
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Russia's invasion of Ukraine has compelled the EU to adopt 13 sanction packages against Russia, demonstrating increased external coherence in the EU's foreign policy. This consensus can potentially drive a more robust upgrade, further fortifying the Union's external coherence. However, this progress is compromised by selective adherence to the EU's values. Employing a multi-tiered theoretical framework, the study hypothesises that external coherence is rooted in a matrix of legal frameworks, policy discourses, and contributions from external actors. Using critical discourse analysis, the research investigates how selective adherence impacts the EU's external coherence by comparing the discourses of four actors: Czechia, Hungary, the European External Action Service (EEAS), and Norway. Findings reveal that selective adherence to EU values is least evident in Hungary, moderately present in Czechia, and most pronounced in Norway, with the EEAS striving to promote coherence despite legislative constraints. While Russia's war in Ukraine has significantly impacted the EU, selective adherence to EU values has nonetheless contributed to fragmented external coherence in its foreign policy, undermining the Union's international credibility and geopolitical position.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Selective adherence to EU values and the quest for external coherence: a comparative discourse analysis of Czechia, Hungary, and Norway Amid Russia's war in Ukraine
Popis výsledku anglicky
Russia's invasion of Ukraine has compelled the EU to adopt 13 sanction packages against Russia, demonstrating increased external coherence in the EU's foreign policy. This consensus can potentially drive a more robust upgrade, further fortifying the Union's external coherence. However, this progress is compromised by selective adherence to the EU's values. Employing a multi-tiered theoretical framework, the study hypothesises that external coherence is rooted in a matrix of legal frameworks, policy discourses, and contributions from external actors. Using critical discourse analysis, the research investigates how selective adherence impacts the EU's external coherence by comparing the discourses of four actors: Czechia, Hungary, the European External Action Service (EEAS), and Norway. Findings reveal that selective adherence to EU values is least evident in Hungary, moderately present in Czechia, and most pronounced in Norway, with the EEAS striving to promote coherence despite legislative constraints. While Russia's war in Ukraine has significantly impacted the EU, selective adherence to EU values has nonetheless contributed to fragmented external coherence in its foreign policy, undermining the Union's international credibility and geopolitical position.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Contemporary European Studies
ISSN
1478-2804
e-ISSN
1478-2790
Svazek periodika
33
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
294-308
Kód UT WoS článku
001273883100001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—