Legal Origins of the European Border Regime: Internalizing the Chinese Exclusion Act
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F25%3A10152841" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/25:10152841 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12115-025-01115-7" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12115-025-01115-7</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-025-01115-7" target="_blank" >10.1007/s12115-025-01115-7</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Legal Origins of the European Border Regime: Internalizing the Chinese Exclusion Act
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The current European border regime is characterized by racialized exclusion. I argue that this is the result of a process ofinternalization of norms whose legal origins can be traced back to the US exclusion era best known for the 1882 ChineseExclusion Act. After a short introduction, I proceed in four steps. First, I describe the origin of racially motivated exclusionlaws targeting Chinese and other Asian immigrants, particularly in the USA. Second, I discuss their legal perpetuation throughthe concomitant development of the plenary power doctrine in American and British case law. Third, I examine the transferof the exclusion doctrine per se into contemporary international and European law and its alleged cleansing of racist bias.Fourth, I describe how these historical developments inform current legal and political decisions shaping the European borderregime. The aim is to expose more clearly the contradictions between anti-discriminatory norms, such as the ones enshrinedin the European Convention on Human Rights, and openly discriminatory legal and political practices regulating unwantedimmigration. Arguably, these practices result from an internalization of racialized exclusion since the Chinese exclusion era.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Legal Origins of the European Border Regime: Internalizing the Chinese Exclusion Act
Popis výsledku anglicky
The current European border regime is characterized by racialized exclusion. I argue that this is the result of a process ofinternalization of norms whose legal origins can be traced back to the US exclusion era best known for the 1882 ChineseExclusion Act. After a short introduction, I proceed in four steps. First, I describe the origin of racially motivated exclusionlaws targeting Chinese and other Asian immigrants, particularly in the USA. Second, I discuss their legal perpetuation throughthe concomitant development of the plenary power doctrine in American and British case law. Third, I examine the transferof the exclusion doctrine per se into contemporary international and European law and its alleged cleansing of racist bias.Fourth, I describe how these historical developments inform current legal and political decisions shaping the European borderregime. The aim is to expose more clearly the contradictions between anti-discriminatory norms, such as the ones enshrinedin the European Convention on Human Rights, and openly discriminatory legal and political practices regulating unwantedimmigration. Arguably, these practices result from an internalization of racialized exclusion since the Chinese exclusion era.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50902 - Social sciences, interdisciplinary
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Society
ISSN
0147-2011
e-ISSN
1936-4725
Svazek periodika
62
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
438-449
Kód UT WoS článku
001527700200001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—