Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

The E-AHPBA - ESSO - Innsbruck consensus recommendations on peri- and postoperative management following liver resection

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F27661989%3A_____%2F26%3A10003000" target="_blank" >RIV/27661989:_____/26:10003000 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://academic.oup.com/bjs/article/113/1/znaf272/8407252" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/bjs/article/113/1/znaf272/8407252</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf272" target="_blank" >10.1093/bjs/znaf272</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    The E-AHPBA - ESSO - Innsbruck consensus recommendations on peri- and postoperative management following liver resection

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Background: Liver surgery carries a high risk of complications due to the interplay of patient-related factors, disease characteristics and liver function. This European consensus provides evidence-based guidance on selected aspects of perioperative care.Methods: A modified Delphi process was used to achieve consensus, with a 70 % agreement threshold. The expert panel comprised hepatobiliary surgeons, anaesthetists, hepatologists, a nurse and physiotherapist. Systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Evidence appraisal and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology.Results: Six topics were addressed: (i) thromboprophylaxis, (ii) antibiotics, (iii) prehabilitation-nutrition-mobilisation, (iv) bile leaks, including bilio-enteric anastomosis, (v) post-hepatectomy haemorrhage, (vi) post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Screening yielded 204 included publications (initial 6514) and thirty-two statements were formulated (median evidence-level:2). Evidence strength varied by topic with lower evidence-levels in complex surgery settings and subcohorts. Study heterogeneity and specific inclusion criteria resulted in some topics in conditional recommendations despite high-level evidence. Weakest evidence was found for thromboprophylaxis and PHLF managment. Strong recommendations were formulated for prehabilitation, mobilisation, and avoidance of routine drainage. Several evidence gaps warranting multicentre studies were identified.Conclusion: Optimising perioperative care after hepatectomy remains challenging. Standardising key practices and addressing evidence gaps through collaborative research are vital to improve outcomes.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    The E-AHPBA - ESSO - Innsbruck consensus recommendations on peri- and postoperative management following liver resection

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Background: Liver surgery carries a high risk of complications due to the interplay of patient-related factors, disease characteristics and liver function. This European consensus provides evidence-based guidance on selected aspects of perioperative care.Methods: A modified Delphi process was used to achieve consensus, with a 70 % agreement threshold. The expert panel comprised hepatobiliary surgeons, anaesthetists, hepatologists, a nurse and physiotherapist. Systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Evidence appraisal and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology.Results: Six topics were addressed: (i) thromboprophylaxis, (ii) antibiotics, (iii) prehabilitation-nutrition-mobilisation, (iv) bile leaks, including bilio-enteric anastomosis, (v) post-hepatectomy haemorrhage, (vi) post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Screening yielded 204 included publications (initial 6514) and thirty-two statements were formulated (median evidence-level:2). Evidence strength varied by topic with lower evidence-levels in complex surgery settings and subcohorts. Study heterogeneity and specific inclusion criteria resulted in some topics in conditional recommendations despite high-level evidence. Weakest evidence was found for thromboprophylaxis and PHLF managment. Strong recommendations were formulated for prehabilitation, mobilisation, and avoidance of routine drainage. Several evidence gaps warranting multicentre studies were identified.Conclusion: Optimising perioperative care after hepatectomy remains challenging. Standardising key practices and addressing evidence gaps through collaborative research are vital to improve outcomes.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30212 - Surgery

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2026

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    BJS British Journal of Surgery

  • ISSN

    0007-1323

  • e-ISSN

    1365-2168

  • Svazek periodika

    113

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    29

  • Strana od-do

    1-29

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001650943800001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-105022093244