Towards efficient logistics through suitable negotiation strategies: the role of uncertainty

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F29142890%3A_____%2F24%3A00048930" target="_blank" >RIV/29142890:_____/24:00048930 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://actalogistica.eu/issues/2024/IV_2024_02_Zapletal_Volny_Lenort.pdf" target="_blank" >https://actalogistica.eu/issues/2024/IV_2024_02_Zapletal_Volny_Lenort.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.22306/al.v11i4.534" target="_blank" >10.22306/al.v11i4.534</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Towards efficient logistics through suitable negotiation strategies: the role of uncertainty

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Uncertainty is a factor that affects many decision-making situations in practice. Supplier management and its flows in companies is no exception. This paper focusses on the choice of the most appropriate strategy towards suppliers in a company. This topic is unfairly neglected in the literature compared to other decisions related to suppliers, such as supplier selection or evaluation. For the sake of robustness, two different hybrid methods of multicriteria decision making, allowing managers to capture the uncertainty, are applied and compared. Namely, the AHP method together with Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis (SMAA), and the fuzzy extension of the PROMETHEE method. The goal of this paper is twofold. First, the best strategy is explored with respect to time and uncertainty before the nomination of a supplier is done and after that. Second, it is pointed out how much oversimplifying and distorting the aggregation of opinions using the averaging operator can be. The results showed that examining individual evaluations helps better understand the impact of the uncertainty on the most suitable strategies towards suppliers, in comparison with the final ranking based on averaging individual opinions. The performed survey revealed that choosing the best strategy before nominating a supplier is more difficult than doing so after the nomination.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Towards efficient logistics through suitable negotiation strategies: the role of uncertainty

Popis výsledku anglicky

Uncertainty is a factor that affects many decision-making situations in practice. Supplier management and its flows in companies is no exception. This paper focusses on the choice of the most appropriate strategy towards suppliers in a company. This topic is unfairly neglected in the literature compared to other decisions related to suppliers, such as supplier selection or evaluation. For the sake of robustness, two different hybrid methods of multicriteria decision making, allowing managers to capture the uncertainty, are applied and compared. Namely, the AHP method together with Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis (SMAA), and the fuzzy extension of the PROMETHEE method. The goal of this paper is twofold. First, the best strategy is explored with respect to time and uncertainty before the nomination of a supplier is done and after that. Second, it is pointed out how much oversimplifying and distorting the aggregation of opinions using the averaging operator can be. The results showed that examining individual evaluations helps better understand the impact of the uncertainty on the most suitable strategies towards suppliers, in comparison with the final ranking based on averaging individual opinions. The performed survey revealed that choosing the best strategy before nominating a supplier is more difficult than doing so after the nomination.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50200 - Economics and Business

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta logistica

ISSN

1339-5629

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

517-526

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85214033762