Big Platforms'Obligations after the ECJ's Android Auto Judgment: In the name of competition, you will serve your competitors

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F29142890%3A_____%2F25%3A00052547" target="_blank" >RIV/29142890:_____/25:00052547 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://neweurope.centre.ubbcluj.ro/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/5_SMEJKAL.pdf" target="_blank" >https://neweurope.centre.ubbcluj.ro/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/5_SMEJKAL.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/OJMNE.2025.49.05" target="_blank" >10.24193/OJMNE.2025.49.05</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Big Platforms'Obligations after the ECJ's Android Auto Judgment: In the name of competition, you will serve your competitors

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper is devoted to the CJEU's decision in Android Auto (C-233/23) of February 25, 2025. In this decision, the ECJ argued for a relatively very large scope of dominant platform obligations dictated by the application of Article 102 TFEU. The analysis seeks to answer two research questions: 1. What are the limits of what a dominant online platform can be forced to do by competition law following the Android Auto decision? and 2. In particular, what does the decision mean for the as yet unsatisfactorily unresolved dispute under EU law between the independent automotive aftermarket (IAA) and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) over the provision of access to connected vehicle functions and resources? Although on the one hand the obligations of dominant platforms to act at the request of and in favour of a competitor are now substantial, on the other hand the ECJ decision does not bring a breakthrough solution for the IAA.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Big Platforms'Obligations after the ECJ's Android Auto Judgment: In the name of competition, you will serve your competitors

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper is devoted to the CJEU's decision in Android Auto (C-233/23) of February 25, 2025. In this decision, the ECJ argued for a relatively very large scope of dominant platform obligations dictated by the application of Article 102 TFEU. The analysis seeks to answer two research questions: 1. What are the limits of what a dominant online platform can be forced to do by competition law following the Android Auto decision? and 2. In particular, what does the decision mean for the as yet unsatisfactorily unresolved dispute under EU law between the independent automotive aftermarket (IAA) and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) over the provision of access to connected vehicle functions and resources? Although on the one hand the obligations of dominant platforms to act at the request of and in favour of a competitor are now substantial, on the other hand the ECJ decision does not bring a breakthrough solution for the IAA.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Online Journal Modelling the New Europe

ISSN

2247-0514

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

—

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

49

Stát vydavatele periodika

RO - Rumunsko

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

83-95

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105027570061