The 2016 Electoral Reform in Mongolia: From Mixed System and Multiparty Competition to FPTP and One-Party Dominance

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13410%2F18%3A43894085" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13410/18:43894085 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021909617698841" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021909617698841</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021909617698841" target="_blank" >10.1177/0021909617698841</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The 2016 Electoral Reform in Mongolia: From Mixed System and Multiparty Competition to FPTP and One-Party Dominance

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article tests the effects of a new electoral system that was introduced in Mongolia for the June 2016 elections. The decision to implement a first-past-the-post (FPTP) system instead of a mixed-member majoritarian (MMM) system, which was first and last used in the previous elections of 2012, was due to the April 2016 ruling of the Mongolian Constitutional Court on unconstitutionality of the list tier as one of the mechanisms for distributing seats within MMM. Through an analysis of national-and district-level results, this article addresses the question whether electoral competition at the district level was consistent with Duverger&apos;s law and resulted in the restoration of bipartism, which had been disrupted in 2012 due to the use of MMM.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The 2016 Electoral Reform in Mongolia: From Mixed System and Multiparty Competition to FPTP and One-Party Dominance

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article tests the effects of a new electoral system that was introduced in Mongolia for the June 2016 elections. The decision to implement a first-past-the-post (FPTP) system instead of a mixed-member majoritarian (MMM) system, which was first and last used in the previous elections of 2012, was due to the April 2016 ruling of the Mongolian Constitutional Court on unconstitutionality of the list tier as one of the mechanisms for distributing seats within MMM. Through an analysis of national-and district-level results, this article addresses the question whether electoral competition at the district level was consistent with Duverger&apos;s law and resulted in the restoration of bipartism, which had been disrupted in 2012 due to the use of MMM.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

he Journal of Asian and African Studies

ISSN

0021-9096

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

53

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

511-531

Kód UT WoS článku

000432618400002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—