Paul Ricoeur?s Recovery of Affectivity: Feeling at the Crossroads of Carnal Imagination and the Corporeal Condition
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13410%2F25%3A43899749" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13410/25:43899749 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://studia.reviste.ubbcluj.ro/index.php/subbphilosophia/article/view/9188" target="_blank" >https://studia.reviste.ubbcluj.ro/index.php/subbphilosophia/article/view/9188</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2025.1.03" target="_blank" >10.24193/subbphil.2025.1.03</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Paul Ricoeur?s Recovery of Affectivity: Feeling at the Crossroads of Carnal Imagination and the Corporeal Condition
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article examines Paul Ric oe ur's conception of the relationship between the affective dimension of experience and imagination's reproductive force. Specifically, it focuses on Ric oe ur's recovery of the affective aspects of human being's incarnate existence and imagination modeled on representation of absent things based on our previous sensory experiences of the world, as dimensions playing a fundamental role in the generation of actions. Regarding Ric oe ur's early phenomenological analysis of the embodied nature of affectivity and imagination, developed in his work entitled Freedom and Nature: The Voluntary and the Involuntary (1950/1960), I will first discuss his understanding of the unity of feeling, imagining, and thinking. More precisely, affectivity, imagination, and thought are mediated through the body's spontaneous experience as situated in time and space and as exercising a particular point of view about the world. Stemming from Ric oe ur's rejection of the naturalistic explanation of volition, these reflections will lead us to consider affectivity and imagination as inseparable from the corporeal limiting factors shaping our decisions. Therefore, the second part of this article will consider the affective and the imaginative components of our experience in the affirming spontaneity of the body in decision-making as involving the necessity to satisfy needs, the apprehension of motives, and the evaluation of objects in the world. The analysis of Ric oe ur's phenomenological account of affectivity and imagination will be enriched through the consideration of the resonances of his early ideas in his theory of imagination as presented in his recently published work Lectures on Imagination (1975/2024). Subjected to the rhythm of passivity and activity, closeness and openness, vulnerability and capability, affectivity and imagination configure the framework for our projects and actions, allowing us to foresee future possibilities.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Paul Ricoeur?s Recovery of Affectivity: Feeling at the Crossroads of Carnal Imagination and the Corporeal Condition
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article examines Paul Ric oe ur's conception of the relationship between the affective dimension of experience and imagination's reproductive force. Specifically, it focuses on Ric oe ur's recovery of the affective aspects of human being's incarnate existence and imagination modeled on representation of absent things based on our previous sensory experiences of the world, as dimensions playing a fundamental role in the generation of actions. Regarding Ric oe ur's early phenomenological analysis of the embodied nature of affectivity and imagination, developed in his work entitled Freedom and Nature: The Voluntary and the Involuntary (1950/1960), I will first discuss his understanding of the unity of feeling, imagining, and thinking. More precisely, affectivity, imagination, and thought are mediated through the body's spontaneous experience as situated in time and space and as exercising a particular point of view about the world. Stemming from Ric oe ur's rejection of the naturalistic explanation of volition, these reflections will lead us to consider affectivity and imagination as inseparable from the corporeal limiting factors shaping our decisions. Therefore, the second part of this article will consider the affective and the imaginative components of our experience in the affirming spontaneity of the body in decision-making as involving the necessity to satisfy needs, the apprehension of motives, and the evaluation of objects in the world. The analysis of Ric oe ur's phenomenological account of affectivity and imagination will be enriched through the consideration of the resonances of his early ideas in his theory of imagination as presented in his recently published work Lectures on Imagination (1975/2024). Subjected to the rhythm of passivity and activity, closeness and openness, vulnerability and capability, affectivity and imagination configure the framework for our projects and actions, allowing us to foresee future possibilities.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Studia Universitatis Babe?-Bolyai Philosophia
ISSN
2065-9407
e-ISSN
1221-8138
Svazek periodika
2025
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
RO - Rumunsko
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
63-81
Kód UT WoS článku
001493968300003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—