Literary Education in Czech Schools

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13430%2F23%3A43897978" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13430/23:43897978 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://bohemistyka.pl/articles/download/13c299eb-919d-451a-9547-40460d3683b0.pdf" target="_blank" >https://bohemistyka.pl/articles/download/13c299eb-919d-451a-9547-40460d3683b0.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/bo.2023.3.10" target="_blank" >10.14746/bo.2023.3.10</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Literary Education in Czech Schools

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The authors of the paper introduce the readers to the context of the literary education in Czech schools. In Czech milieu were hold many polemic discussions, that are known at least since the year 1890. Into that discussions were involved big personalities of conterporary cultural live, among others Hubert Gordon Schauer, František Krejčí, Jaroslav Vlček, Otakar Hostinský, Vilém Mathesius and Jan Mukařovský. In many cases thay evaluated teaching of literature as distant from the life of a young generation, too historically oriented, and pointed out its deficient connection with aesthetics of a literary work. They held against excessive memorization as contrary to the little emphasis put on reading and analysis of literary work. The authors of the paper are strongly convinced that even after more than 130 years of polemic discussions about the form of literary education and a series of reforms (which cannot even be taken into account because it is not clear where one reform ends and another begins), the real curriculum of literary education has not fundamentally changed.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Literary Education in Czech Schools

Popis výsledku anglicky

The authors of the paper introduce the readers to the context of the literary education in Czech schools. In Czech milieu were hold many polemic discussions, that are known at least since the year 1890. Into that discussions were involved big personalities of conterporary cultural live, among others Hubert Gordon Schauer, František Krejčí, Jaroslav Vlček, Otakar Hostinský, Vilém Mathesius and Jan Mukařovský. In many cases thay evaluated teaching of literature as distant from the life of a young generation, too historically oriented, and pointed out its deficient connection with aesthetics of a literary work. They held against excessive memorization as contrary to the little emphasis put on reading and analysis of literary work. The authors of the paper are strongly convinced that even after more than 130 years of polemic discussions about the form of literary education and a series of reforms (which cannot even be taken into account because it is not clear where one reform ends and another begins), the real curriculum of literary education has not fundamentally changed.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50302 - Education, special (to gifted persons, those with learning disabilities)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Bohemistyka

ISSN

1642-9893

e-ISSN

16429893

Svazek periodika

23

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

465-476

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85174056773