Community participation in landslide risk reduction: a case history from Central Andes, Peru
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13440%2F19%3A43894749" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13440/19:43894749 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/67985891:_____/19:00511840
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10346-019-01203-w" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10346-019-01203-w</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01203-w" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10346-019-01203-w</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Community participation in landslide risk reduction: a case history from Central Andes, Peru
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article describes the intertwined history of scientific research and landslide disaster risk reduction efforts in a small peasant community in the Rampac Grande of the Peruvian Andes. It was struck by a catastrophic landslide in 2009, claiming five fatalities and challenging local knowledge about landslide occurrence and mitigation practices. This article describes collaboration between a team of scientists, comprising both foreign and Peruvian experts and the local community, which started after the 2009 landslide and culminated during the disaster risk reduction (DRR) project which ran from 2016 to 2017. It illustrates the shift from refusing outside intervention to acceptance of the proposed measures and active community participation in their application and maintenance. This was achieved by rethinking the role of local and scientific knowledge during the process of DRR through enhanced communication and the appropriate use of the participative methods. Emphasis is placed on the crucial role played by community representative participation during formulation of the expected outcomes of the DRR, which leads to hazard reduction through the preparation of hazard maps and of the monitoring of landslide movement. Enhanced community development can also be evidenced by the construction of water tanks in the year following termination of the project. Despite the documented short-term success in landslide DRR, defining long-term exit strategy allowing the community to continue applying the measures with necessity of the minimum input from the outside actors is intrinsically difficult and still needs to be resolved.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Community participation in landslide risk reduction: a case history from Central Andes, Peru
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article describes the intertwined history of scientific research and landslide disaster risk reduction efforts in a small peasant community in the Rampac Grande of the Peruvian Andes. It was struck by a catastrophic landslide in 2009, claiming five fatalities and challenging local knowledge about landslide occurrence and mitigation practices. This article describes collaboration between a team of scientists, comprising both foreign and Peruvian experts and the local community, which started after the 2009 landslide and culminated during the disaster risk reduction (DRR) project which ran from 2016 to 2017. It illustrates the shift from refusing outside intervention to acceptance of the proposed measures and active community participation in their application and maintenance. This was achieved by rethinking the role of local and scientific knowledge during the process of DRR through enhanced communication and the appropriate use of the participative methods. Emphasis is placed on the crucial role played by community representative participation during formulation of the expected outcomes of the DRR, which leads to hazard reduction through the preparation of hazard maps and of the monitoring of landslide movement. Enhanced community development can also be evidenced by the construction of water tanks in the year following termination of the project. Despite the documented short-term success in landslide DRR, defining long-term exit strategy allowing the community to continue applying the measures with necessity of the minimum input from the outside actors is intrinsically difficult and still needs to be resolved.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10508 - Physical geography
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA16-02521S" target="_blank" >GA16-02521S: Individuální a organizační rozhodování v redukci environmentálních rizik: determinanty, motivace a efektivita</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Landslides
ISSN
1612-510X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
16
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
9
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
1763-1777
Kód UT WoS článku
000482448500012
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85068907819