Quantifying inconsistencies in old cadastral maps and their impact on land-use reconstructions

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13440%2F20%3A43895465" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13440/20:43895465 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/60460709:41330/20:82195 RIV/44555601:13520/20:43895465

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1747423X.2020.1765427" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1747423X.2020.1765427</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2020.1765427" target="_blank" >10.1080/1747423X.2020.1765427</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Quantifying inconsistencies in old cadastral maps and their impact on land-use reconstructions

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Old cadastral maps represent a historical reference dataset for long-term land-use reconstructions. This study presents identification of inconsistencies in the nineteenth century Franziscean cadastre, one of the largest sets of old cadastral maps worldwide, by comparing three versions of the maps and written documents created in the same period. We identified all parcels and their land-use in the four sub-sources in six study areas. The overall share of inconsistencies among 5 771 identified parcels is 7.4%, with the biggest share of inconsistency in agroforestry and forestry classes. The most frequent inconsistencies are of &apos;Not differentiable land use&apos; (n = 212) and &apos;Different land-use&apos; categories across the sub-sources (n = 113). We conclude that the frequency of uncertainties in old cadastral maps may limit the validity of historical land-use reconstructions, affecting the eventual restoration and management efforts based on such data. We provide a summary for the use of Franziscean cadastre.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Quantifying inconsistencies in old cadastral maps and their impact on land-use reconstructions

Popis výsledku anglicky

Old cadastral maps represent a historical reference dataset for long-term land-use reconstructions. This study presents identification of inconsistencies in the nineteenth century Franziscean cadastre, one of the largest sets of old cadastral maps worldwide, by comparing three versions of the maps and written documents created in the same period. We identified all parcels and their land-use in the four sub-sources in six study areas. The overall share of inconsistencies among 5 771 identified parcels is 7.4%, with the biggest share of inconsistency in agroforestry and forestry classes. The most frequent inconsistencies are of &apos;Not differentiable land use&apos; (n = 212) and &apos;Different land-use&apos; categories across the sub-sources (n = 113). We conclude that the frequency of uncertainties in old cadastral maps may limit the validity of historical land-use reconstructions, affecting the eventual restoration and management efforts based on such data. We provide a summary for the use of Franziscean cadastre.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50704 - Environmental sciences (social aspects)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Land Use Science

ISSN

1747-423X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

15

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

570-584

Kód UT WoS článku

000538124000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85085468541