Clinical practice recommendations on the management of perioperative cardiac arrest: A report from the PERIOPCA Consortium
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13450%2F21%3A43896819" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13450/21:43896819 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-021-03695-2#citeas" target="_blank" >https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-021-03695-2#citeas</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03695-2" target="_blank" >10.1186/s13054-021-03695-2</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Clinical practice recommendations on the management of perioperative cardiac arrest: A report from the PERIOPCA Consortium
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
BackgroundPerioperative cardiac arrest is a rare complication with an incidence of around 1 in 1400 cases, but it carries a high burden of mortality reaching up to 70% at 30 days. Despite its specificities, guidelines for treatment of perioperative cardiac arrest are lacking. Gathering the available literature may improve quality of care and outcome of patients.MethodsThe PERIOPCA Task Force identified major clinical questions about the management of perioperative cardiac arrest and framed them into the therapy population [P], intervention [I], comparator [C], and outcome [O] (PICO) format. Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published until September 2020 were performed. Consensus-based treatment recommendations were created using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The strength of consensus among the Task Force members about the recommendations was assessed through a modified Delphi consensus process.ResultsTwenty-two PICO questions were addressed, and the recommendations were validated in two Delphi rounds. A summary of evidence for each outcome is reported and accompanied by an overall assessment of the evidence to guide healthcare providers.ConclusionsThe main limitations of our work lie in the scarcity of good quality evidence on this topic. Still, these recommendations provide a basis for decision making, as well as a guide for future research on perioperative cardiac arrest.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Clinical practice recommendations on the management of perioperative cardiac arrest: A report from the PERIOPCA Consortium
Popis výsledku anglicky
BackgroundPerioperative cardiac arrest is a rare complication with an incidence of around 1 in 1400 cases, but it carries a high burden of mortality reaching up to 70% at 30 days. Despite its specificities, guidelines for treatment of perioperative cardiac arrest are lacking. Gathering the available literature may improve quality of care and outcome of patients.MethodsThe PERIOPCA Task Force identified major clinical questions about the management of perioperative cardiac arrest and framed them into the therapy population [P], intervention [I], comparator [C], and outcome [O] (PICO) format. Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published until September 2020 were performed. Consensus-based treatment recommendations were created using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The strength of consensus among the Task Force members about the recommendations was assessed through a modified Delphi consensus process.ResultsTwenty-two PICO questions were addressed, and the recommendations were validated in two Delphi rounds. A summary of evidence for each outcome is reported and accompanied by an overall assessment of the evidence to guide healthcare providers.ConclusionsThe main limitations of our work lie in the scarcity of good quality evidence on this topic. Still, these recommendations provide a basis for decision making, as well as a guide for future research on perioperative cardiac arrest.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30218 - General and internal medicine
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Critical Care
ISSN
1364-8535
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
25
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
265
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
1-8
Kód UT WoS článku
000680846000001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—