Repeated Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in the Vertebrobasilar Territory

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13450%2F21%3A43898533" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13450/21:43898533 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://karger.com/crn/article/13/2/510/821050/Repeated-Intravenous-Thrombolysis-in-Patients-with" target="_blank" >https://karger.com/crn/article/13/2/510/821050/Repeated-Intravenous-Thrombolysis-in-Patients-with</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000518193" target="_blank" >10.1159/000518193</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Repeated Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in the Vertebrobasilar Territory

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Acute ischemic vertebrobasilar stroke (AIVBS) is usually associated with poor outcome and prognosis and in case of basilar artery occlusion (BAO) with high mortality. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), as a standard recanalization therapy of acute ischemic stroke (IS) within first 4.5 h, can be administrated beyond this therapeutic time window in case of symptomatic BAO. Repeated IVT is generally contraindicated in case of early recurrent IS, despite a risk of poor outcome or death after recurrent IS. The aim was to present 2 cases of repeated IVT for recurrent AIVBS and discuss specific situations where repeated IVT may be considered. Up to now, repeated IVT has been reported only in recurrent stroke in anterior circulation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Repeated Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in the Vertebrobasilar Territory

Popis výsledku anglicky

Acute ischemic vertebrobasilar stroke (AIVBS) is usually associated with poor outcome and prognosis and in case of basilar artery occlusion (BAO) with high mortality. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), as a standard recanalization therapy of acute ischemic stroke (IS) within first 4.5 h, can be administrated beyond this therapeutic time window in case of symptomatic BAO. Repeated IVT is generally contraindicated in case of early recurrent IS, despite a risk of poor outcome or death after recurrent IS. The aim was to present 2 cases of repeated IVT for recurrent AIVBS and discuss specific situations where repeated IVT may be considered. Up to now, repeated IVT has been reported only in recurrent stroke in anterior circulation.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30210 - Clinical neurology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Case Reports in Neurology

ISSN

1662-680X

e-ISSN

1662-680X

Svazek periodika

13

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

510-514

Kód UT WoS článku

000694037500038

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85112358915