Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Efficacy and possible positive predictors: a systematic review
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13450%2F25%3A43899201" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13450/25:43899201 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11130/25:10499765
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425001304" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425001304</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.104311" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.bas.2025.104311</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Efficacy and possible positive predictors: a systematic review
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Introduction: Current best practice for the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) involves ventriculoperitoneal shunt implantation, which is associated with several long-term complications. Throughout the last two decades endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has emerged as an alternate therapeutic modality. This modality promises a lower incidence of surgical and postoperative complications. This review focuses on patients with iNPH treated via ETV, compares the efficacy of ETV between individual studies and summarizes predictive measures of ETV success. Methods: The development of the protocol was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis Protocols 2015 statement. Relevant literature was selected using complex registers and in several bibliographical databases. A total of 17 original articles comparing the efficacy of ETV were selected for the review, 12 of which were used to analyze positive predictors of ETV therapy. Results: A total of 282 patients with iNPH underwent ETV, with an average efficacy 63.7 %. Positive predictors of ETV treatment were the presence of pathological outflow resistance (Rout) in the ventricular compartment during cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamic tests, hyperdynamic CSF flow, functional stenosis of the Sylvian aqueduct and/or bowing of the third ventricle on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Further positive predictors included short duration of symptoms and a predominantly gait-centric clinical presentation. Conclusion: Endoscopic treatment of patients with iNPH remains controversial and shunt surgery remains the treatment of choice. The analyzed studies show that a subset of patients profit from ETV. Further studies with robust randomized cohorts comparing ETV to shunting are necessary.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Efficacy and possible positive predictors: a systematic review
Popis výsledku anglicky
Introduction: Current best practice for the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) involves ventriculoperitoneal shunt implantation, which is associated with several long-term complications. Throughout the last two decades endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has emerged as an alternate therapeutic modality. This modality promises a lower incidence of surgical and postoperative complications. This review focuses on patients with iNPH treated via ETV, compares the efficacy of ETV between individual studies and summarizes predictive measures of ETV success. Methods: The development of the protocol was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis Protocols 2015 statement. Relevant literature was selected using complex registers and in several bibliographical databases. A total of 17 original articles comparing the efficacy of ETV were selected for the review, 12 of which were used to analyze positive predictors of ETV therapy. Results: A total of 282 patients with iNPH underwent ETV, with an average efficacy 63.7 %. Positive predictors of ETV treatment were the presence of pathological outflow resistance (Rout) in the ventricular compartment during cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamic tests, hyperdynamic CSF flow, functional stenosis of the Sylvian aqueduct and/or bowing of the third ventricle on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Further positive predictors included short duration of symptoms and a predominantly gait-centric clinical presentation. Conclusion: Endoscopic treatment of patients with iNPH remains controversial and shunt surgery remains the treatment of choice. The analyzed studies show that a subset of patients profit from ETV. Further studies with robust randomized cohorts comparing ETV to shunting are necessary.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Brain and Spine
ISSN
2772-5294
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2025
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
5
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
1-8
Kód UT WoS článku
001533703900002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—