Multicriteria decision analysis: a multifaceted approach to medical equipment management

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13510%2F14%3A43885919" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13510/14:43885919 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/68407700:21460/14:00217455

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.943333" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.943333</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.943333" target="_blank" >10.3846/20294913.2014.943333</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Multicriteria decision analysis: a multifaceted approach to medical equipment management

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Selecting medical equipment is a complex multidisciplinary task requiring mathematical tools, considering associated uncertainties. This paper offers an in-depth study of multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods to identify the most appropriateones for performing management tasks in resource-limited settings. The chosen articles were divided into three topics: evaluation of projects and equipment, selection of projects and equipment, and development of medical devices. Three methods (analytichierarchy process [AHP], multi attribute utility theory and elimination and choice expressing reality) were selected for detailed analyses of their application for medical equipment management. Twenty-one work using MCDA, artificial neural networks, human factors engineering, and value analysis were analysed in the framework of medical equipment management. The important aspects of the procedure were described, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. It was determined that the

Název v anglickém jazyce

Multicriteria decision analysis: a multifaceted approach to medical equipment management

Popis výsledku anglicky

Selecting medical equipment is a complex multidisciplinary task requiring mathematical tools, considering associated uncertainties. This paper offers an in-depth study of multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods to identify the most appropriateones for performing management tasks in resource-limited settings. The chosen articles were divided into three topics: evaluation of projects and equipment, selection of projects and equipment, and development of medical devices. Three methods (analytichierarchy process [AHP], multi attribute utility theory and elimination and choice expressing reality) were selected for detailed analyses of their application for medical equipment management. Twenty-one work using MCDA, artificial neural networks, human factors engineering, and value analysis were analysed in the framework of medical equipment management. The important aspects of the procedure were described, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. It was determined that the

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NT11532" target="_blank" >NT11532: Hodnocení zdravotnických prostředků</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

ISSN

2029-4913

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

20

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

LT - Litevská republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

576-589

Kód UT WoS článku

000343809900010

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—