Emergence of a Dominant Party System After Multipartyism: Theoretical Implications from the Case of the AKP in Turkey

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13510%2F15%3A43885976" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13510/15:43885976 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13608746.2014.968981#.VNSto-aG_h5" target="_blank" >http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13608746.2014.968981#.VNSto-aG_h5</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2014.968981" target="_blank" >10.1080/13608746.2014.968981</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Emergence of a Dominant Party System After Multipartyism: Theoretical Implications from the Case of the AKP in Turkey

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This study aims to provide insights into how and why a dominant party system emerges after an era of multipartyism. Conceptualising the emergence phase of a dominant party system within the framework of Sartori's 'predominant party system', it elaboratesthe causal weight of different theories within the Turkish context through a comparative-historical analysis. Comparing the case of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) with the Justice Party (AP), it argues that perceptions of an incumbent's good economic performance and lack of centrifugal intra-party conflicts are two crucial factors that lead to the emergence of a dominant party system after multipartyism. Restrictive electoral rules and existing social cleavages, however, create a favourable setting for this outcome.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Emergence of a Dominant Party System After Multipartyism: Theoretical Implications from the Case of the AKP in Turkey

Popis výsledku anglicky

This study aims to provide insights into how and why a dominant party system emerges after an era of multipartyism. Conceptualising the emergence phase of a dominant party system within the framework of Sartori's 'predominant party system', it elaboratesthe causal weight of different theories within the Turkish context through a comparative-historical analysis. Comparing the case of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) with the Justice Party (AP), it argues that perceptions of an incumbent's good economic performance and lack of centrifugal intra-party conflicts are two crucial factors that lead to the emergence of a dominant party system after multipartyism. Restrictive electoral rules and existing social cleavages, however, create a favourable setting for this outcome.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

South European Society and Polititcs

ISSN

1360-8746

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

20

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

71-92

Kód UT WoS článku

000350106200001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—