On solatium: towards a rethinking of compensation

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13510%2F22%3A43896602" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13510/22:43896602 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14445921.2021.1992260?scroll=top&needAccess=true" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14445921.2021.1992260?scroll=top&needAccess=true</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2021.1992260" target="_blank" >10.1080/14445921.2021.1992260</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

On solatium: towards a rethinking of compensation

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Sovereign governments generally benefit from the capacity to commute private property rights to public ownership in order to undertake projects for the public benefit. When private property rights are compulsorily acquired by Australian governments, the criteria for the assessment of compensation accruing to the dispossessed landowner ordinarily requires consideration of a raft of heads of possible compensation. The primary aim of this paper is to canvass how those elements of traditional concepts of solatium as one of the heads of compensation ought now be viewed in the light of the defining High Court decision in Northern Territory v Griffiths [2019] HCA 7. However, a secondary aim (of the authors) is also to give consideration as to how the notion of solatium now fits in the broader Constitutional framework of the heads of compensation for private property rights compulsorily acquired. NSW legislation is used in this paper as a general exemplar of the Australian legal milieu regarding compulsory acquisition law and practice.

Název v anglickém jazyce

On solatium: towards a rethinking of compensation

Popis výsledku anglicky

Sovereign governments generally benefit from the capacity to commute private property rights to public ownership in order to undertake projects for the public benefit. When private property rights are compulsorily acquired by Australian governments, the criteria for the assessment of compensation accruing to the dispossessed landowner ordinarily requires consideration of a raft of heads of possible compensation. The primary aim of this paper is to canvass how those elements of traditional concepts of solatium as one of the heads of compensation ought now be viewed in the light of the defining High Court decision in Northern Territory v Griffiths [2019] HCA 7. However, a secondary aim (of the authors) is also to give consideration as to how the notion of solatium now fits in the broader Constitutional framework of the heads of compensation for private property rights compulsorily acquired. NSW legislation is used in this paper as a general exemplar of the Australian legal milieu regarding compulsory acquisition law and practice.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Pacific Rim Property Research Journal

ISSN

1444-5921

e-ISSN

2201-6716

Svazek periodika

27

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

75-88

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85138568376