What benefits are the most important to you, your community, and society? Perception of ecosystem services provided by nature-based solutions

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13510%2F22%3A43897053" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13510/22:43897053 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wat2.1612" target="_blank" >https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wat2.1612</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1612" target="_blank" >10.1002/wat2.1612</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

What benefits are the most important to you, your community, and society? Perception of ecosystem services provided by nature-based solutions

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Ecosystem services (ES) provided by nature-based solutions (NBS) have been examined using various data collection techniques and preference elicitation methods to understand what ES are important to human well-being. This article provides a systematic review of 153 scientific publications, with a focus on data collection techniques and perspectives of well-being used when eliciting preferences toward multiple ES provided by NBS. ES provided by urban parks, urban trees, and community gardens are the most commonly examined; however, generally specified NBS such as &quot;green spaces&quot; or &quot;green infrastructure&quot; prevail. The review further shows that the questionnaire surveys is the dominant technique for bringing evidence about the most preferred ES, followed by semi-structured interviews and workshops. Only a limited number of studies use revealed or stated preference methods as a part of data collection efforts such as a choice experiment or contingent valuation. Additionally, the review defines three different perspectives of well-being considered but rarely discussed in existing studies: individual; community; and society well-being perspectives. As the concept of well-being is hardly discussed in NBS literature and still depends on a large degree of subjectivity, this review highlights the need for future research that looks more deeply at individual, community, and social well-being, which is influenced differently by the implementation of NBS.

Název v anglickém jazyce

What benefits are the most important to you, your community, and society? Perception of ecosystem services provided by nature-based solutions

Popis výsledku anglicky

Ecosystem services (ES) provided by nature-based solutions (NBS) have been examined using various data collection techniques and preference elicitation methods to understand what ES are important to human well-being. This article provides a systematic review of 153 scientific publications, with a focus on data collection techniques and perspectives of well-being used when eliciting preferences toward multiple ES provided by NBS. ES provided by urban parks, urban trees, and community gardens are the most commonly examined; however, generally specified NBS such as &quot;green spaces&quot; or &quot;green infrastructure&quot; prevail. The review further shows that the questionnaire surveys is the dominant technique for bringing evidence about the most preferred ES, followed by semi-structured interviews and workshops. Only a limited number of studies use revealed or stated preference methods as a part of data collection efforts such as a choice experiment or contingent valuation. Additionally, the review defines three different perspectives of well-being considered but rarely discussed in existing studies: individual; community; and society well-being perspectives. As the concept of well-being is hardly discussed in NBS literature and still depends on a large degree of subjectivity, this review highlights the need for future research that looks more deeply at individual, community, and social well-being, which is influenced differently by the implementation of NBS.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews WIREs. Water

ISSN

2049-1948

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

9

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

1-17

Kód UT WoS článku

000847925600001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85137324685