STKDE plus approach reveals wildlife-vehicle collision hotspots at broken fence locations
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44994575%3A_____%2F23%3A10001551" target="_blank" >RIV/44994575:_____/23:10001551 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/60460709:41320/23:97171
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10344-023-01735-6" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10344-023-01735-6</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-023-01735-6" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10344-023-01735-6</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
STKDE plus approach reveals wildlife-vehicle collision hotspots at broken fence locations
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Road fencing is considered one of the most effective traffic safety measures to avoid wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC). Construction errors during fence installation, intrinsic defects and other inconsistencies allow, however, for wildlife to enter the roads. WVC thus occur even at many fenced places. We analysed WVC, from fenced D10 and D11 motorways in Czechia, which took place between 2009 and 2019. We applied the spatial-temporal KDE+ method (STKDE+) in order to determine both spatial and temporal WVC hotspot patterns. We further compared the WVC temporal pattern before and after the installation of fences. Three hotspot patterns were described: hotspot disappearance (after proper design and construction of a fence), emergence of a new hotspot (at places with fence gaps or improper fence ends) and stability of a hotspot over time (non-effective fences). We found that improper design of fencing induced WVC occurrence. We further concluded that the STKDE+ method can be used to effectively determine the effectiveness of safety measures. The STKDE+ analysis revealed 32 WVC hotspots, which contained 46% of all WVC. The fence-end effect and fence gaps caused WVC in 20 and 5 cases, respectively.
Název v anglickém jazyce
STKDE plus approach reveals wildlife-vehicle collision hotspots at broken fence locations
Popis výsledku anglicky
Road fencing is considered one of the most effective traffic safety measures to avoid wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC). Construction errors during fence installation, intrinsic defects and other inconsistencies allow, however, for wildlife to enter the roads. WVC thus occur even at many fenced places. We analysed WVC, from fenced D10 and D11 motorways in Czechia, which took place between 2009 and 2019. We applied the spatial-temporal KDE+ method (STKDE+) in order to determine both spatial and temporal WVC hotspot patterns. We further compared the WVC temporal pattern before and after the installation of fences. Three hotspot patterns were described: hotspot disappearance (after proper design and construction of a fence), emergence of a new hotspot (at places with fence gaps or improper fence ends) and stability of a hotspot over time (non-effective fences). We found that improper design of fencing induced WVC occurrence. We further concluded that the STKDE+ method can be used to effectively determine the effectiveness of safety measures. The STKDE+ analysis revealed 32 WVC hotspots, which contained 46% of all WVC. The fence-end effect and fence gaps caused WVC in 20 and 5 cases, respectively.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
European Journal of Wildlife Research
ISSN
1612-4642
e-ISSN
1439-0574
Svazek periodika
69
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
1-12
Kód UT WoS článku
001097080100001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85173726079